I’m a high school student and teaching myself a tiny bit of maths. I stumbled over a problem, I can’t find a proof for (and neither found a proof for it in the internet or in books, but I guess there is one).

If the root test is inconclusive, then the ratio test is inconclusive, too ( in other words: if the root test equals one, then the ratio test equals one).

Is this statement true? And is there a proof for it?

Any help is appreciated.

(The point of the proof should be showing that the root test is stronger than the ratio test. I know examples for this, but can't find a proof (maybe proof by contradiction?).)

What I want to show is:

$ lim sup \sqrt[n]{|a_n|}=1 \implies lim |\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}|=1$

New contributor
Marko is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct.


Your Answer

Marko is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.