LEMMA Suppose $g \in L_{\text {loc }}^{1}\left(\mathbb{R}^{n}\right)$ is nonnegative. Then for any $u \in C(\bar{\Omega}) \cap$ $C^{2}(\Omega)$ there holds $$ \int_{\tilde{M}_{(0)}} g \leq \int_{\Gamma^{+}} g(D u)\left|\operatorname{det} D^{2} u\right| $$
where $\Gamma^{+}$is the upper contact set of $u$ ( that is $\Gamma^{+}=\{y \in \Omega: u(x) \leq u(y)+D u(y) \cdot(x-y) \text { for any } x \in \Omega\} \text {. }$) and $\tilde{M}=\left(\sup _{\Omega} u-\sup _{\partial \Omega} u^{+}\right) / d$ with $d=\operatorname{diam}(\Omega)$
PROOF OF LEMMA : Without loss of generality we assume $u \leq 0$ on $\partial \Omega$(this is because that the relation it's preserved by the translation.). Set $\Omega^{+}=\{u>0\}$. By the area formula for $D u$ in $\Gamma^{+} \cap \Omega^{+} \subset \Omega$, we have $$ \int_{D u\left(\Gamma^{+} \cap \Omega^{+}\right)} g \leq \int_{\Gamma^{+} \cap \Omega^{+}} g(D u)\left|\operatorname{det}\left(D^{2} u\right)\right|, \tag{1} $$ where $\left|\operatorname{det}\left(D^{2} u\right)\right|$ is the Jacobian of the map $D u: \Omega \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{n}$. In fact, we may consider $\chi_{\varepsilon}=D u-\varepsilon$ Id $: \Omega \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^{n}$. Then $D \chi_{\varepsilon}=D^{2} u-\varepsilon I$, which is negative definite in $\Gamma^{+}$. Hence by the change-of-variable formula we have $$ \int_{\chi_{\varepsilon}\left(\Gamma^{+} \cap \Omega^{+}\right)} g=\int_{\Gamma^{+} \cap \Omega^{+}} g\left(\chi_{\varepsilon}\right)\left|\operatorname{det}\left(D^{2} u-\varepsilon I\right)\right|, \tag{2} $$ which implies (1) if we let $\varepsilon \rightarrow 0$. ...
I can't work out the proof of this lemma, there are two question:
- why the change of variable formula holds? I found a post here.However it's unclear $\Gamma^+ \cap \Omega^+$ is convex or not?
- why after taking the limit the equality (2) becomes inequality (1)?