2
$\begingroup$

I would like to evaluate an integral numerically over the surface of an ellipsoid. Take an $N \times N$ grid over the parameter space $(u, v) \in [0, 2\pi) \times [0, \pi) $. A simple approximation of the integral is $$ \int_0^{2\pi}\int_0^\pi \mathbf{f}(u,v)\,dA \simeq \sum_{i,j=1}^N \mathbf{f}(u_i,v_j)\, \Delta A(u_i,v_j) $$ where $\Delta A(u_i, v_j)$ is the surface area of the portion of the ellipsoid spanned by the parameter region $(u_i, u_{i+1}) \times (v_j, v_{j+1})$.

I had hoped to compute $\Delta A(u_i, v_j)$ analytically: \begin{equation} \Delta A(u_i, v_j) = \int_{u_i}^{u_{i+1}}\int_{v_j}^{v_{j+1}}dA. \end{equation} To derive $dA$ I used the first fundamental form, $dA = \sqrt{EG-F^2}du\,dv$. An example of its application to an ellipsoid can be found in this answer, though note that (1) $dA$ is merged with the integrand and (2) $u$ and $v$ are switched from here.

Here is what I obtain:

$$ dA = \sqrt{a^2b^2 \cos^2 v \sin^2 v + c^2 \sin^4v\ (b^2 \cos^2 u + a^2 \sin^2 u)}\ \ du\,dv, $$ where $a,b,c$ are the semi-major axes associated with $x,y,z$ respectively.

I am almost certain that with this expression for $dA$, the integral for $\Delta A(u_i, v_j)$ above cannot be evaluated analytically.

Do I need to resort to a numerical approximation of $\Delta A(u_i, v_j)$? If so, in light of the simplistic approximation of the original integral, will it be sufficient to use the area of the trapezoid formed by connecting the image of the four points $(u_i, v_j), (u_{i+1}, v_j), (u_{i}, v_{j+1}), (u_{i+1}, v_{j+1})$ in $\mathbb{R}^3$?

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

I may be oversimplifying this, but the geometry seems to be be a non-issue. The formula for integrating over a parametrized surface $\vec r=\vec r(u,v)$ is $$\iint_D f(\vec r(u,v))|\vec r_u\times \vec r_v|\,du\,dv \tag1$$ where $D$ is the parameter domain (rectangle in your case). There is no conceptual difference between the factors $f(\vec r(u,v))$ and $|\vec r_u\times \vec r_v|$ in (1). It's just an integral over a rectangle of some function $g(u,v)= f(\vec r(u,v))|\vec r_u\times \vec r_v|$. To evaluate (1) numerically, your can sample the integrand $g$ along a grid and multiply by appropriate rectangular areas $\Delta u_i \Delta v_j$.

the trapezoid formed by connecting the image of the four points

The images of four points will not lie in the same plane in general, much less form a trapezoid. The term $|\vec r_u\times \vec r_v|\,du\,dv$ implicitly uses approximation of a piece of the surface with a parallelogram.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ That makes a lot of sense. I did not stop to think about using $g(u,v) = f(\mathbf{r}(u,v))|\mathbf{r}_u \times \mathbf{r}_v|$ because I had already computed $f(\mathbf{r}(u,v))$ numerically. The drawing I made on a napkin of a section of the ellipsoid in which the 4 points form a trapezoid is a compelling but incomplete proof of my claim; I am stuck at the part where I need to show that a plane is determined by four points... $\endgroup$ – Eric Kightley Jul 15 '13 at 21:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.