Suppose we are given the function $$\theta = \ln |z| \quad \text{defined on the upper half plane $\{ z \in \mathbb{C} \colon \Im( z) > 0\}$}$$ Naively, I would go and manipulate $$ \ln | z| = \ln (z\bar z)^{\frac{1}{2}} = \frac{1}{2}(\ln z + \ln \bar z + 2\pi i k(z)) \quad \text{(for some integer - valued function $k$)} $$ and so, because of the last term being integer-valued and non-constant, one cannot take partial derivatives $\partial \theta / \partial z$, $\partial \theta / \partial \bar z$.

On the other hand, the complex logarithm is holomorphic in $\mathbb{C} \setminus (-\infty,0)$ so I ought to be able to differentiate after all since I am only working on the upper half plane.

But one of the problems I have with this reasoning is that $\theta$ is a real - valued function, so if it is holomorphic then it must be constant. There must be an error in my reasoning, what am I doing wrong?

My guess is that I am erroneously mixing up the complex logarithm on the right hand side and the real logarithm on the left hand side, and that $\log \bar z$ is also not the complex logarithm but the composition of the latter with complex conjugation .. Unfortunately I am out of depth with the complex logarithm, my course in Complex Analysis barely scratched the surface of the study of this interesting function.

Many thanks for your help!!

  • $\begingroup$ It seems to me that you haven't actually chosen a branch of the complex logarithm - of course you can modify a logarithm by $2\pi i k$ and get another logarithm... the idea though is that if you restrict yourself to a specific branch of the logarithm, you get a holomorphic function. $\endgroup$ – Nick Peterson Jul 13 '13 at 12:03
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ $\log z$ is holomorphic, $\log|z|$ isn't. $|z|$ isn't. $\endgroup$ – Gerry Myerson Jul 13 '13 at 12:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Basically, $z\to\bar z$ is not holomorphic. $\endgroup$ – Thomas Andrews Jul 13 '13 at 12:46

$f\colon z\mapsto \ln \bar z$ is not homolorphic because $f(z+h)=f(z)+\frac1{\bar z}\cdot \bar h + o(h)$ whereas holomorphic needs $f(z+h)=f(z)+a\cdot h+o(h)$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.