0
$\begingroup$

I was trying to solve this problem, which says to find the limit:

$$\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty}\left(\frac{\pi}{2}-\tan^{-1}x\right)^{\Large\frac{1}{x}}$$

Since the OP said the answer was one, and I knew that $\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} x^{\large \frac 1x}=1$ , I wanted to show that $\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty}\left(\frac{\pi}{2}-\tan^{-1}x\right)=\lim_{x \to \infty}x$ , or that $\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \large \frac {\left(\frac{\pi}{2}-\tan^{-1}x\right)}{x}=1$ . Using this assumption I arrived at $\lim_{x \to \infty} \cot x =\lim_{x \to \infty} x$ , which is nonsense because the limit on the LHS does not exist. When I later checked what this limit was on Wolframalpha, I found that $\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} \large \frac {\left(\frac{\pi}{2}-\tan^{-1}x\right)}{x}=0$ . So how come that since this limit is not $1$ , $\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty}\left(\frac{\pi}{2}-\tan^{-1}x\right)^{\Large\frac{1}{x}}$ is $1$? Thanks.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Actually I think I just figured this out. $\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty}\left(\frac{\pi}{2}-\tan^{-1}x\right)^{\Large\frac{1}{x}}$ is actually equal to $\lim_{x \to \infty} \frac 1x$ , and $\lim_{x \to \infty} (1/x)^{(1/x)}=1$ $\endgroup$ – Ovi Jul 11 '13 at 2:33
2
$\begingroup$

There are a lot of issues in what you write: mainly, if you know that $\lim_{x\to\infty} f(x) = \lim_{x\to\infty} g(x)$, you cannot conclude from it that $\lim_{x\to\infty} f(x)/g(x) = 1$.

For example, $\lim_{x\to\infty} \frac{n^2}{n} \neq 1$, and $\lim_{x\to\infty} \frac{n}{n^2} \neq 1$.

So let's go through your question step-by-step:

  • Firstly, because $\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty}\left(\frac{\pi}{2}-\tan^{-1}x\right)^{\Large\frac{1}{x}} = 1$, and $\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} x^{\large \frac 1x}=1$, you want to show that $\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty}\left(\frac{\pi}{2}-\tan^{-1}x\right)=\lim_{x \to \infty}x$. This is already wrong: the left-hand-side limit is $0$, while the right-hand-side limit is $\infty$. (What would be correct is wanting to show that $\displaystyle \lim_{x\to\infty} \frac{\left(\frac{\pi}{2}-\tan^{-1}x\right)^{1/x}}{x^{1/x}} = 1$, but you cannot get rid of the $\frac1x$ in the exponent like that.)

  • Next, even to show that $\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty}\left(\frac{\pi}{2}-\tan^{-1}x\right)=\lim_{x \to \infty}x$, you want to show that $\lim_{x \rightarrow \infty} {\large \frac {\left(\frac{\pi}{2}-\tan^{-1}x\right)}{x}}=1$: wrong idea again, because $\lim_{x\to\infty} f(x) = \lim_{x\to\infty} g(x)$ may be true without it being true that $\lim_{x\to\infty} f(x)/g(x) = 1$.

  • From this you arrived (again I'm not exactly sure how) at the conclusion that $\lim_{x \to \infty} \cot x =\lim_{x \to \infty} x$, which you yourself realized is nonsense.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I know that if two functions have the same limit their ration is not necessarily $1$ , but in a cases where $\lim_{x \to \infty} (f(x))^{1/x}=1$ , you could argue that in the cases where $\lim_{x \to \infty} f(x) \not =1/x$ , then $\lim_{x \to \infty} \frac {f(x)}{x}=1$ , right? $\endgroup$ – Ovi Jul 11 '13 at 2:49
  • $\begingroup$ And the way I arrived at $\lim_{x \to \infty} \cot x =\lim_{x \to \infty} x$ is by treating my limit as an equation, solving for $\arctan x , and taking the tangent of both sides$ . Is this wrong too? I know that sometimes you can and sometimes you can't treat a limit like an equation. $\endgroup$ – Ovi Jul 11 '13 at 2:52
  • $\begingroup$ @Ovi: Wrt the first comment: no it's not right that if $\lim_{x\to\infty}(f(x))^{1/x}=1$ and $\lim_{x\to\infty} f(x)\neq1/x$, then $\lim_{x\to\infty}\frac{f(x)}{x}=1$: this particular one is itself an example, with $f(x)=\frac{\pi}{2}-\tan^{-1}x$ and $\lim_{x\to\infty} f(x) = 0$. In fact the limit $\lim_{x\to\infty}(f(x))^{1/x}=1$ holds for $f(x)$ being a lot of things: $x$, $x^2$, $x^3$, $x^n$, $x^{0.5}$, $\log x$, $\log \log x$, $1$, $2$, $\frac1x$... basically, intuitively $f(x)$ growing at any rate slower than exponential in $x$. (For $f(x)=c^x$, we have $\lim_{x\to\infty}(f(x))^{1/x}=c$.) $\endgroup$ – ShreevatsaR Jul 11 '13 at 3:16
  • $\begingroup$ @Ovi: Wrt to the second, for the precise details you need to look up a textbook, but roughly you can do some things (treating it as an "equation") when the limits involved are not infinite. So you have things like $\lim f(x) = \lim g(x) \implies \lim f(x)/g(x) = 1$ if $\lim f(x) \neq \infty$ (and $\neq 0$). See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limit_of_a_function#Properties $\endgroup$ – ShreevatsaR Jul 11 '13 at 3:18
3
$\begingroup$

Look at the function $\arctan(x)$. It tends towards $\pi/2$ as $x \rightarrow \infty$. So the quantity in parentheses in your first equation goes towards zero, but since the exponent is also going to zero, you get 1. Meanwhile, the function $x$ obviously goes to infinity in the limit. This is all basically a result of the fact that when you raise anything to the 0 power, you get 1. Similarly, just because $5^0=7^0$, you cannot conclude that $5=7$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ "but since the exponent is also going to zero, you get 1" - ? $\endgroup$ – anon Jul 11 '13 at 2:40
2
$\begingroup$

Why would you expect that

$$\lim_{x\to\infty}\frac{\frac{\pi}2-\tan^{-1}x}x=1\;?\tag{1}$$

You know that $$\lim_{x\to\infty}\tan^{-1}x=\frac{\pi}2\;,$$

so the numerator of the fraction in $(1)$ approaches $0$ while the denominator blows up. That clearly forces the fraction to approach $0$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I wasn't thinking at all, I was just going on the fact that $\lim_{x \to \infty} x^{1/x}=1$ $\endgroup$ – Ovi Jul 11 '13 at 2:35
  • $\begingroup$ @Ovi: Thinking does help. :-) It occurred to me that you might have been thinking of logarithmic differentiation of $\left(\frac{\pi}2-\tan^{-1}x\right)^{1/x}$ and have forgotten that there’s be a log in the numerator. $\endgroup$ – Brian M. Scott Jul 11 '13 at 2:40

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.