from real to complex
You state that "taking the square root of $-1$" gets you out of the reals and into the complex numbers. That is kinda true, but also misleading. Without complex numbers, the "square root" functions is simply only defined for non-negative real numbers, so there is simply no way to take the square root of negative one. The same way as division $a/b$ is only defined for $b\neq 0$.
It is cleaner to state the process like this: We are looking for an extension of the real numbers such that:
- The extended set of numbers still forms a "field" (i.e. laws like commuativitiy and associativity still hold)
- There is a number "$i$" such that $i\cdot i=-1$.
- The extended field should be as small as possible given these previous conditions.
It turns out, that this has a unique answer, which are the complex numbers.
from complex to quaternions
Here again, you are asking for an extension. So you have to state what new objects you want to have, and what properties you want to preserve. Here is one version of that:
- we want numbers $i,j,k$ such that
\begin{align}
(ai+bj+ck)^2 = \text{some constant} \cdot (a^2 + b^2 + c^2)
\end{align}
for all real numbers $a,b,c$. You could either view this as an artificial challenge, but actually, problems like these do turn up in particle physics for example (related to "spin").
Now the problem is, that it is mathematically impossible to have these numbers $i,j,k$ and also preserve all properties of a field. But if you are willing to give up commutativity (while preserving associativity and the law of distribution), the unique smallest extension is the quaternions.
(-1)^1/2
where domain is real, it gives non-reali
as result which indeed is a complex. $\endgroup$