when finding the Laurent series for $\frac{1}{(z-1)(z-2)}$ in the region $|z| <1$, I thought that one should first evaluate where the poles are, inside or outside the given region. z=2 is outside the region, but still, Saff and Snyder include that term in the Laurent series obtaining:
\begin{equation} \frac{1}{(z-1)(z-2)}=\frac{1}{z-2}-\frac{1}{z-1} \end{equation}
Such that they get for $|z|<1$ the following series for the first term:
\begin{equation} \frac{1}{z-2}=-\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{1-\frac{z}{2}}=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\big(\frac{z}{2}\big)^n=-\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\big(\frac{z^n}{2^{n+1}}\big) \end{equation}
for the second term they get:
$\frac{1}{z-1}= -\frac{1}{1-z}=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}z^n$
which they combine by subtraction to get :
\begin{equation} \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\bigg(-\frac{1}{2^{n+1}}+1\bigg)z^n \end{equation}
But for another case $\frac{z^2-2z+3}{z-2}$, Saff and Snyder write "Notice that the region $|z-1| <1$ excludes $z=2$."
So isn't this as the residue theorem, where poles outside of the region are simply not included in the calculation - hence, one should not include them in the Laurent series?
This was confusing indeed.
Any comments?
Thanks