3
$\begingroup$

I come across this problem which is about bifurcation. I am trying to take all the cases. I am expecting Hopf bifurcation to occur here but the last case I could not find the fixed point. Could you please help me?

Consider the vector field on plane \begin{align} \dot{x} &= x - xy +1\\ \label{sys1} \dot{y} &= \alpha y + \beta x^2,\nonumber \end{align}

where $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are parameters. Study the bifurcation of the dynamical system in as much details as possible. You have to study the situation in the neighbourhood of the Bogdonov-Takens bifurcation points.

[Case 1:] When $\alpha=0$ and $\beta =0$ we have not equilibrium point. [Case 2:] Assume $\beta=0$.

\begin{align} \dot{z} &= z - zy +1\\ \label{sys2} \dot{y} &= \alpha y\nonumber \end{align}

When $\alpha=0$ we go back to case 1, however when $\alpha \not = 0$ we have a equilibrium point $(-1,0)$. Shifting the fixed point to the origin by $z= x-1$ we have the system

\begin{equation} \begin{aligned} \dot{x} &= x+y - x y \\ \dot{y} &= \alpha y \end{aligned} \end{equation}

which has the fixed point $(0,0)$. Finding the Jacobian for (\ref{sys3})

$$A_{(0,0)} = \begin{pmatrix} 1&&1\\ 0&& \alpha \end{pmatrix}, $$

we can see that the eigenvalues are $\lambda_1=1$, and $\lambda_2=\alpha$ with the eigenvectors

$$v_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 1\\ 0 \end{pmatrix}, \text{ and } v_2 = \begin{pmatrix} \frac{1}{\alpha -1} \\1 \end{pmatrix}$$ When $\alpha \geq 0$ the equilibrium point (0,0) unstable (source) with two dimension unstable manifold, and when $\alpha <0$ the equilibrium point $(0,0)$ is a hyperbolic unstable (saddle) equilibrium point; and the stable and unstable eigenspaces are;

$$\mathcal{E}^s = \{ (x,y) \in \mathbb{R}^2 | y= \frac{1}{\alpha - 1} x \}, \text{ and } \mathcal{E}^u = \{ (x,y) \in \mathbb{R}^2 | y= 0 \}$$

with one dimension stable manifold and one dimension unstable manifold.

Case 3: Assume $\alpha=0$. When $\beta =0$ we go to case 1. When $\beta \not =0$ we have the system has no fixed points.

Case 4: When $\alpha \not = 0 $, and $\beta \not = 0$

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
+100
$\begingroup$

Hint.

Analyzing the intersections of

$$ \cases{ x-x y+1 =0\\ \lambda y +x^2=0 } $$

we can foresight the equilibrium points qualification.

For $\lambda \approx -1 $

enter image description here

For $\lambda\approx -5$

enter image description here

Here the tangency point is solved easily as follows

$$ \lambda x+x^3+\lambda = (x-x_1)^2(x-x_2) $$

so equating to zero the $x$'s powers coefficients

$$ \cases{ \lambda+x_1^2x_2 = 0\\ \lambda -x_1^2-2x_1x_2 = 0\\ 2x_1+x_2=0 } $$

we get $x_1 = -\frac 32, x_2=3, \lambda = -\frac{27}{4}$

For $\lambda\approx -35$

enter image description here

For $\lambda \approx 1$

enter image description here

NOTE

For $\lambda > 0$ we have one equilibrium point.

For $-\frac{27}{4}<\lambda< 0$ we have one equilibrium point.

For $\lambda < -\frac{27}{4}$ we have three equilibrium points.

For a given equilibrium point $(x_0,y_0)$ the Jacobian is

$$ J=\left( \begin{array}{cc} 1-y_0 & -x_0 \\ 2 x_0 & \lambda \\ \end{array} \right) $$

with eigenvalues

$$ \frac 12\left(\lambda+1-y_0\pm\sqrt{(y_0-1+\lambda)^2-8x_0^2}\right) $$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.