Wikipedia gives a first definition of Krull rings, based on prime ideals of minimum height, while the Encyclopedia of Mathematics gives a second definition based on valuations.

Is there a direct (and hopefully simple) proof of the equivalence of the two definitions, not based on the theory of divisorial ideals?


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.