Given a continuous map $f:S^n \to S^n$, the homological degree of $f$ is defined to be the integer $\deg f_*$ such that $f_*(\alpha)=(\deg f_*)\alpha$ for any $\alpha \in H_n(S^n) \approx \mathbb{Z}$.
Exercise 2.2.8 in Hatcher's text asks the reader to consider a complex polynomial $p:\mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{C}$. If this polynomial is nonconstant, then setting $p(\infty)=\infty$ gives an extension of $p$ to the one point compactification $p:\hat{\mathbb{C}} \to \hat{\mathbb{C}}$. But $\hat{\mathbb C} \approx S^2$, so one can consider the homological degree of $p$. Turns out, this degree is equal to the degree of $p$ as a polynomial. $$\deg p_* = \deg p$$
If you do this whole thing over $\mathbb{R}$ instead, with one point compacitication $\hat{\mathbb R} \approx S^1$, you don't get an analagous result. If $p(x)=a_nx^n + \dotsb +a_1x+a_0$ with $a_i \in \mathbb{R}$ (and $a_n \not= 0$), then $$\deg p_* = \begin{cases} 0 & \text{if $n$ is even} \\ \operatorname{sign} a_n & \text{if $n$ is odd} \end{cases}$$ where $\operatorname{sign}$ is the $\pm 1$ sign of a nonzero real number.
This led me to wonder what happens in other scenarios. For instance, what happens over the quaternions $\mathbb{H}$ with $\hat{\mathbb H} \approx S^4$? I'm not even sure what "quaternionic polynomial" would mean since the quaternions aren't commutative, so expressions like $i \cdot q \cdot i$ and $(i^2)q=-q$ aren't equivalent.
What about other complete fields, like $p$-adics $\mathbb{Q}_p$? These spaces are much worse topologically, in particular totally disconnected. But one can still consider the projective lines $\mathbb{P}^1(\mathbb{Q}_p)$ (which is the same as the one point compactification in the $\mathbb{R}$ and $\mathbb{C}$ case at least). I imagine that number theorists and algebraic geometers have invented some appropriate analog of singular homology to study maps of these things.