I'm learning about discrete math, more precisely about demonstration techniques. The thing is, I'm not always sure if I'm doing it the right way, I don't want to trust my intuition because maybe I'm doing it the wrong way. So I would like to know if my line of reasoning makes sense, if I am correct about the final result.
Problem:
For every integer $n ≥ 0$, then $n2+n$ is divisible by $2$.
What I tried to do:
For every integer $n ≥ 0$... That means it's any number greater than or equal to $0$, so it's infinite elements.
Then $n2+n$ is divisible by $2$...
I must replace $n$ with an integer value that matches the statement $n ≥ 0$. I can start with $0$ itself. So I multiply $0$ by $2$ and then add $+ 1$. So I get to the final result, and all I have to do is check if, in fact, this theorem is correct.
I created a table, testing 4 possible cases only, because the cases are infinite.
So, I arrived at the thesis (conclusion). And so, the theorem doesn't match, it's not true that: every integer $n ≥ 0$, then $n2+n$ is divisible by $2$.
There will always be elements that are not divisible by two, they will be the odd numbers.
I could also write using existential connective:
$∃ n ∈\Bbb Z ≥ 0 \mid n ¬ / 2$
I'm not sure how to use quantifier connectives. But the idea is that: there is an integer n greater than or equal to 0 that is not divisible by 2.
Again, I would like to know if my line of reasoning makes sense and if I am correct. Thanks.