2
$\begingroup$

I am trying to prove that Green's relations on a group coincide, that is, $\mathcal{L}=\mathcal{R}=\mathcal{H}=\mathcal{D}=\mathcal{J}$. It can be easily deduced that $\mathcal{H},\mathcal{D},\mathcal{J}$ conicide with $\mathcal{L}$ and $\mathcal{R}$ once we establish that $\mathcal{L}=\mathcal{R}$. So, we first try to show that for any $a,b\in G$, $aG=bG \iff Ga=Gb$. It's this that I'm struggling with. (What makes a group different from a semigroup is that it has an identity and inverses. So, we should probably make use of this in the proof.) This is what I have so far:

Since $G$ has an identity, we have that $a\in aG$ and $b\in bG$. Thus, there exist $g,g'\in G$ such that $a=bg$ (1) and $b=ag'$ (2). Then $aG=bG\iff bgG=ag'G\iff GbgG=Gag'G$. Cancel $G$ on the left (we know this can be done since we have inverses): $Gbg=Gag'$. We are done if we can show $g=g'$. This is done by substituting equations 1 and 2 into each other: $a=bg=ag'g\iff 1=g'g$ and $b=bgg'\iff 1=gg'$ thus $gg'=g'g$ therefore $g=g'$.

Can anyone tell me if this is correct? Thanks.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'm not sure about the step of cancelling $G$. Wouldn't that imply $a=b$? $\endgroup$
    – Shaun
    Commented Oct 28, 2021 at 14:24
  • $\begingroup$ Oh - if we could cancel $G$, then we could cancel $G$ from the start to just have $a=b$. Right. $\endgroup$
    – tashakinns
    Commented Oct 28, 2021 at 14:30

2 Answers 2

3
$\begingroup$

Since $G\unlhd G$, we have $Ga=aG=bG=Gb$ as cosets.

$\endgroup$
5
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Okay, I agree. Since G is a normal subgroup of itself, its left cosets are equal to its right cosets. Thanks! $\endgroup$
    – tashakinns
    Commented Oct 28, 2021 at 14:42
  • $\begingroup$ You're welcome, @tashakinns. $\endgroup$
    – Shaun
    Commented Oct 28, 2021 at 14:43
  • $\begingroup$ I now need to show that the relation $\mathcal{L}$ is equivalent to the relation $G\times G$. I am trying to prove by contradiction (i.e., assume there is one element of $G\times G$ such that $a$ is not $mathcal{L}$-related to $b$. But I get nowhere with this. Any thoughts? $\endgroup$
    – tashakinns
    Commented Oct 28, 2021 at 18:56
  • $\begingroup$ I suggest you ask that as a separate question, @tashakinns. However, you could use the fact that a semigroup $S$ is a group if and only if $aS=S=Sa$ for all $a\in S$. $\endgroup$
    – Shaun
    Commented Oct 28, 2021 at 19:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I essentially just worked that out a few moments ago, although through visualising a group's Cayley table as opposed to recognising the equality itself. Thanks for your help! :) $\endgroup$
    – tashakinns
    Commented Oct 28, 2021 at 19:27
0
$\begingroup$

Let $a \in G$. Then the map $x \to ax$ (respectively $x \to xa$) is bijective: just observe that, for each $a, b$, the equation $ax = b$ has a unique solution, namely $x = a^{-1}b$. It follows that $aG = Ga = G$ and hence $R(a) = L(a) = H(a) = D(a) = J(a)$. Thus $\cal R = \cal L = \cal H = \cal D = \cal J$ in $G$.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .