1
$\begingroup$

Let $(M,g)$ be a conformally compact surface.

An example situation is a hyperbolic surface of infinite area like the quotient $\Gamma\backslash \mathbb{H}$, where $\mathbb{H}$ is the hyperbolic plane and $\Gamma = \langle T \rangle \subset PSL(2, \mathbb{R})$ a Fuchsian group that is a cyclic group generated by a hyperbolic transformation $T$.

Let $\Delta_g$ be its associated Laplace-Beltrami-operator on functions. I read in some math papers that the orthogonal projection to $ \ker \Delta_g$ vanishes here - in contrast to the case of a closed Riemannian manifold. How to show this this fact? Are there "nice" characterizations of the nullspace of the Laplacian?

Thanks for your help!

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

I received a deciding hint now:

Since the area of these surfaces isn't finite, the constant functions are not $L^2$-functions any longer. In particular they are not 0-eigenfunctions as in the case of closed surfaces and therefore $\lambda=0$ is not in the discrete spectrum of $\Delta_g$.

It's well known that the continous spectrum of $\Delta_{\mathbb{H}}$ is $[1/4, \infty)$, so zero is not in the continous spectrum either. That's why $\ker \Delta_g = \{ 0 \}$ and therefore the projection onto it vanishes.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.