My solution: $$\sin\theta+\cos\theta=\sqrt{2\sin2\theta}$$
$$\sin\theta+\cos\theta=\sqrt{2\times2\sin\theta\cos\theta}$$
$$\sin\theta+\cos\theta=2\sqrt{\sin\theta\cos\theta}$$
$$\sin\theta-2\sqrt{\sin\theta\cos\theta}+\cos\theta=0$$
$$(\sqrt{\sin\theta}-\sqrt{\cos\theta})^2=0\tag{*}$$
$$\sqrt{\sin\theta}=\sqrt{\cos\theta}$$
$$\sqrt{\tan\theta}=1\tag#$$
$$\tan\theta=1$$
$$\theta=n\pi+\frac{\pi}{4}$$
Note that $$\frac{\sqrt{\sin\theta}}{\sqrt{\cos\theta}}=1\implies\sqrt{\frac{\sin\theta}{\cos\theta}}=1$$ but $$\sqrt{\frac{\sin\theta}{\cos\theta}}=1\kern.6em\not\kern -.6em \implies\frac{\sqrt{\sin\theta}}{\sqrt{\cos\theta}}=1;$$ so, $$\dfrac{\sqrt{\sin\theta}}{\sqrt{\cos\theta}}\not\equiv\sqrt{\tan\theta}.$$ In step $(\#)$, you introduced extraneous solutions—expanding the set of candidate solutions—by allowing $\sin\theta$ and $\cos\theta$ to be both negative (as well as both positive).
Nevertheless, $(\#)$ is a valid step, as the forward implication is correct.
However, the above may be moot, since the prior step $(*)$ may have discarded solutions and thus may be invalid: without justification, it is not apparent that $$\sin\theta-2\sqrt{\sin\theta\cos\theta}+\cos\theta=0\implies(\sqrt{\sin\theta}-\sqrt{\cos\theta})^2=0,$$ since \begin{align}&{}{}\sin\theta-2\sqrt{\sin\theta\cos\theta}+\cos\theta\\\not\equiv&{}{}\sin\theta-2\sqrt{\sin\theta}\sqrt{\cos\theta}+\cos\theta\\\equiv&{}{}(\sqrt{\sin\theta}-\sqrt{\cos\theta})^2.\end{align}
(The converse is certainly true though.)
Here, the forward-implication does turn out to be justifiable: $\theta$ happens to reside in the first quadrant, so $\sin\theta$ and $\cos\theta$ are indeed both positive.
Addendum 1: suggested solution
\begin{align}&{}\sin\theta+\cos\theta=\sqrt{2\sin2\theta}\\
\color{red}\implies &{}1+\sin2\theta=2\sin2\theta\\
\iff &{}\sin2\theta=1\\ \iff&{}\theta=(4n+1)\frac\pi4.\tag1\end{align} The first step above turns out to have introduced extraneous solutions $(\text{for example, }\frac{5\pi}4),$ which we must prune out. Alternatively, we could note the implicit restriction (changing the $\color{red}\implies$ to $\color{red}\iff)$ $$\sin\theta+\cos\theta\geq0\\
\sqrt2\sin\left(\theta+\frac\pi4\right)\geq0\\
\theta+\frac\pi4\in\bigcup[2n\pi,(2n+1)\pi]$$
$$\theta\in\bigcup[(8n-1)\frac\pi4,(8n+3)\frac\pi4].\tag2$$ Combining $(1)$ and $(2)$: $$\theta=(8k+1)\frac\pi4\\=\frac\pi4+2k\pi.$$
Addendum 2
So, steps that create extraneous roots are still valid.
We are arguing from mathematical axioms and given a context, so the step $\big(Q(x)\to R(x)\big)$ is valid precisely when it is mathematically true in that context.
For example, given $(x-3)(x-4)=0,$ the step $\big(x\in\{3,4\}{\implies} x\in\{3,4,7\}\big)$ is valid, even though it makes the candidate solution set less precise; however, it isn't valid to then deduce that $\big((x-3)(x-4)=0{\iff} x\in\{3,4,7\}\big),$ that is, that the actual solution set is $\{3,4,7\}.$
However, steps that discard solutions are invalid, right?
Yes, $\big(x\in\{3,4\}{\implies}x\in\{4\}\big)$ is an invalid step.
Also, I think that (*) might be valid because $\theta$ is in the first quadrant: see @user's answer. If $\theta$ is in the first quadrant, then $\sin\theta=|\sin\theta|$ & $\cos\theta=|\cos\theta|.$
Yes, $(*)$ turns out to be a valid step. But since you had neither shown (using the given equation's implicit conditions) nor even asserted that $θ$ in fact lies in quadrant $1$ (rather than quadrant $3),$ your presentation there may be too sketchy/hand-wavy.