
We reproduce the diagram given with the problem statement after extending it by adding the line segments $GB$, $GK$, $GD$, $HC$, $HL$, and $HD$, where $D$, $G$, and $H$ are the centers of the circles $\alpha$, $\beta$, and $\gamma$ respectively. We also draw the segments $KE$ and $LF$, and then extend both so that they meet at $N$. Please note that the line passing through $N$ and $P$, which intersects with $BC$ at $M$, is also added.
For brevity, let $\measuredangle CAB = 2\phi$. Furthermore, we have $\measuredangle BAP = \measuredangle PAC = \phi$, because $AP$ is the angle bisector of the angle $CAB$.
Let’s do some angle chasing. Since $DE$, $DA$, and $DF$ are radii of the circle $\alpha$, the triangles $EDA$ and $ADF$ are isosceles triangles. As a consequence,
$$\measuredangle AED = \measuredangle DFA = \phi. \tag{1}$$
Since, the angles $BEG$ and $HFC$ are vertically opposite to the angles $AED$ and $DFA$ respectively, we have from (1),
$$\measuredangle BEG = \measuredangle HFC = \phi. \tag{2}$$
Since $GB$ and $GE$ are radii of the circle $\beta$, the triangles $EGB$ is an isosceles triangle. Therefore, using (2), we shall write,
$$\measuredangle GBE = \measuredangle BEG = \phi. \tag{3}$$
Since $HC$ and $HF$ are radii of the circle $\gamma$, the triangles $CHF$ is an isosceles triangle. Therefore, as per (2), we get,
$$\measuredangle FCH = \measuredangle HFC = \phi. \tag{4}$$
Now, pay attention to the circle $\beta$ exclusively. According to (3), the angle on the other side of the apex angle of the isosceles triangle $EGB$ can be expressed as
$$\measuredangle BGE = 180^o + \measuredangle GBE + \measuredangle BEG =180^o + 2\phi. \tag{5}$$
Angles $BKE$ and $BGE$ are subtended by the same arc of the circle $\beta$ at its circumference and the center respectively. From (5), it follows that
$$\measuredangle BKE = \frac{\measuredangle BGE}{2} = 90^o + \phi. \tag{6}$$
The angle $EKL$ is the supplement of the angle $BKE$. Hence, from (6), we have,
$$\measuredangle EKL = 90^o - \phi. \tag{7}$$
It is time to divert our attention to the circle $\gamma$. Using (4), the angle $CHF$ at the apex of the isosceles triangle $CHF$ can be written as
$$\measuredangle CHF = 180^o - \measuredangle FCH - \measuredangle HFC =180^o - 2\phi. \tag{8}$$
Angles $CLF$ and $CHF$ are subtended by the same arc of the circle $\gamma$ at its circumference and the center respectively. From (8), it follows that
$$\measuredangle CLF = \frac{\measuredangle CHF}{2} = 90^o - \phi. \tag{9}$$
According to (7) and (9), $\triangle LNK$ is an isosceles triangle. Its apex angle $LNK$ is given by
$$\measuredangle LNK = 180^o - \measuredangle NKL - \measuredangle KLN = 2\phi. \tag{10}$$
Therefore, we have $\measuredangle FNE = \measuredangle FAE$, which means that the point $N$ lies on the circle $\alpha$. Since $PNE$ and $PAE$ are angles in the same segment, $\measuredangle PNE = \measuredangle PAE = \phi$. Due to a similar reason, $\measuredangle FNP = \measuredangle FAP = \phi$ as well. Now, we have enough evidence, i.e. $\measuredangle PNE = \measuredangle FNP$, to state that $NM$ is the bisector of the angle $LNK$. Since $\triangle LNK$ is an isosceles triangle, $NM$ is perpendicular to $KL$, which makes the point $M$ the midpoint of the segment $KL$.
As the final step of this proof, consider the two right triangles $KMP$ and $PML$, where we have $\measuredangle KMP = \measuredangle PML = 90^o$. The side $MP$ is common to both triangles. Since $M$ is the midpoint of $KL$, we have $KM =ML$. According to SAS rule, the two triangles are congruent requiring $PK = PL$.