Finding a straight line that makes a given angle with a given straight line Question:
Find the equation of the straight line that passes through $(6,7)$ and makes an angle $45^{\circ}$ with the straight line $3x+4y=11$.
My solution (if you want, you can skip to the bottom):
Manipulating the given equation to get it to the slope-intercept form,
$$3x+4y=11...(i)$$
$$\implies 4y=-3x+11$$
$$\implies y=\frac{-3}{4}x+\frac{11}{4}$$
Let, the slope of (i) is $m_1=\frac{-3}{4}$, and the slope of our desired equation is $m_2$. Now, according to the question,
$$\tan(45^{\circ})=\pm\frac{-\frac{3}{4}-m_2}{1-\frac{3}{4}m_2}...(1)$$
$$\implies 1=\pm\frac{-\frac{3}{4}-m_2}{1-\frac{3}{4}m_2}$$
$$\implies \pm \frac{3}{4}+m_2=1-\frac{3}{4}m_2...(ii)$$
Picking positive value from (ii),
$$\frac{3}{4}+m_2=1-\frac{3}{4}m_2$$
$$\implies m_2(1+\frac{3}{4})=1-\frac{3}{4}$$
$$\implies m_2=\frac{1-\frac{3}{4}}{1+\frac{3}{4}}$$
$$\implies m_2=\frac{1}{7}$$
Picking negative value from (ii),
$$-\frac{3}{4}-m_2=1-\frac{3}{4}m_2$$
$$\implies -\frac{3}{4}-m_2=1-\frac{3}{4}m_2$$
$$\implies -m_2(1-\frac{3}{4})=1+\frac{3}{4}$$
$$\implies m_2=-\frac{1+\frac{3}{4}}{1-\frac{3}{4}}$$
$$\implies m_2=-7$$
Picking $m_2=\frac{1}{7}$, the equation of the straight line that passes through $(6,7)$,
$$\frac{y-7}{x-6}=\frac{1}{7}$$
$$\implies 7y-49=x-6$$
$$\implies -x+7y-43=0$$
$$\implies x-7y+43=0...(iii)$$
Picking $m_2=-7$, the equation of the straight line that passes through $(6,7)$,
$$\frac{y-7}{x-6}=-7$$
$$\implies -7x+42=y-7$$
$$\implies 7x+y-49=0...(iv)$$
Now, we are getting two straight lines as a result. One makes $45^{\circ}$ with $3x+4y=11$ in the counterclockwise direction ($x-7y+43=0$), and the other makes $45^{\circ}$ with $3x+4y=11$ in the clockwise direction ($7x+y-49=0$). So, is $7x+y-49=0$ a valid solution to the above question as it makes $-45^{\circ}$ not $45^{\circ}$?
 A: You previously asked why your same solution to the same exercise is returning two separate gradients, to which I commented:
“Algebraically, since $\tan\theta=\pm \frac{m_1-m_2}{1+m_1m_2}$ is effectively two separate linear equations in $m_2,$ why wouldn't you get two answers for $m_2?$ BTW, a shorter alternative to the second to fourth chunks of your presentation is
$$\arctan(m)-\arctan\left(-\frac34\right)=\pm\frac\pi4\\m=\tan\left(\pm\frac\pi4-\arctan\left(\frac34\right)\right)\\=\frac17\;\text{ or }\;-7,$$ where $\arctan(m)$ is the anticlockwise angle between the line of gradient $m$ and the positive $x$-axis.”
This indirectly addresses your current question of why your solution returns two separate straight lines.

Now, we are getting two straight lines as a result. One makes
$45^{\circ}$ with the given line in the counterclockwise direction,
and the other makes $45^{\circ}$ with it in the
clockwise direction. So, is $7x+y-49=0$ a valid solution
to the above question as it makes $-45^{\circ},$ not $45^{\circ}$?

Notice that when two straight lines intersect, the angle between them is uniquely specified by some angle in $[0,90^\circ].$ This is in fact the standard way to specify the angle between two straight lines.
Also, notice that when you say “one makes $45^\circ$ with the given line in the counterclockwise direction”, you could well have equivalently thought of it as a clockwise angle, since there is no inherent directionality when measuring the angle between two lines (i.e., clockwise or counterclockwise depends merely on which you have chosen as the reference line). As such, $45^\circ$ (counterclockwise) and $-45^\circ$ (clockwise) are equivalent in this context. Based on the previous paragraph, they are all just standardly specified as $45^\circ.$

Related: while it's unambiguous to speak of the angle between two lines (and this angle is uniquely specified by $[0,90^\circ]$) and the angle between two vectors (and this angle is uniquely specified by $[0,180^\circ]$), there are two possible angles between two line segments: a reflex angle, and a non-reflex angle.
A: I don't see any reason why the clockwise angle would be invalid.
In some contexts, such as trigonometry, we, by convention, write the angle as the counterclockwise angle from the positive $x$-axis. In others, such as true compass bearings, the angle is, again by convention, measured clockwise (from North).
So for this question, with no specified convention, a $45$° angle is a $45$° angle, regardless of whether it is clockwise or counterclockwise. Unless this is from a class or textbook in which you only consider counterclockwise angles, or if the question specifies it, both lines would be a valid solution to the given problem; they pass through the given point and they make a $45°$ angle with the given line.
