I wanted to show that

$$ \lim_{n\to\infty} \bigg( \frac{n+\lfloor x \sqrt{n} \rfloor}{n-\lfloor x \sqrt{n} \rfloor}\bigg)^{\lfloor x \sqrt{n} \rfloor} =e^{2x^2} $$ After applying $x \sqrt{n} -1 \leq \lfloor x \sqrt{n} \rfloor \leq x \sqrt{n}$ and replacing $\sqrt{n}$ with $k$, I tried to squeeze it. It worked out quite nicely with l'Hospital's rule.

Yet soon I realized that given $n\in \mathbb N$ I can neither replace nor use l'Hospital's rule. I recalled Stolz–Cesàro theorem yet it seems to be a nightmare to apply it here.

What should I do in this particular case? Is there a way to justify the replacement and the use of the l'Hospital's rule?


After thinking for a while I am ready to answer my own question:

Both the replacement and the use of l'Hospital's rule are justified here since if $\lim_{x\to\infty}f(x)$ exists then $\lim_{n\to\infty}f(n)$ exists as well (since it's merely a subsequence) and is equal the former. Yet the opposite it's true since $\lim_{n\to\infty}\cos(2\pi n)$ exists but $\lim_{x\to\infty}\cos(2\pi x)$ doesn't.


If a limit $\lim_{x\to\infty} f(x) = L$ holds for $x\in \mathbb R$ then also $\lim_{n\to\infty}f(n)=L$ necessarily. Hence you can replace $n$ with $x$ and then $x$ with $k^2$ and IF the continuous result gives a good limit THEN the original limit was the same. The converse does not hold; you can't go from knowing a discrete limit to a continuous one.

The reason for this is that the definition of a real limit $f(y)\to L$ as $y\to x$ implies that for any particular sequence of points $x_n\to x$ tending to that limit we have $f(x_n)\to L$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.