0
$\begingroup$

Given two mutually exclusive events $A$ and $B$ where $\mathbb{P}(X=A)=\alpha$ and $\mathbb{P}(X=B)=\beta\ \ (=1-\alpha)$ suppose we want to estimate $\alpha$. However we are only given samples from $(X,Y)$ (without knowledge of whether $X=A$ or $B$) for the values $C_k$ where the marginals $C_{A}=Y|X=A$ and $C_B=Y|X=B$ satisfy

$\mathbb{P}(C_A=C_k)=p_k=1/N,$ (uniform) where $k=1,...,N$

$\mathbb{P}(C_B=C_k)=q_k$ for $k=1,...,N.$

Obviously if $q_k$ is close to $p_k$ for all $k$ we cannot estimate $\alpha$ since the later stage samples are identically distributed. But if $q_k$ and $p_k$ differ substantially you should get a good estimate. Is anyone aware of a documented solution for this problem, or feel they can come up with a good estimate?

It should be a well documented problem I expect but I am not that comfortable with sample bias statistics. The probability estimates should depend on the number of samples $m$ and the differences between the probabilities $p_k$ and $q_k$.

P.S. If anyone believes there is need for further clarification, please let me know. I am trying to mathematically interpret the problem of estimating the number of samples from one of two datasets and where each set takes values with different probability compared to each other.

$\endgroup$
9
  • $\begingroup$ Your model is unclear. How are events $A$ and $B$ related? If they are not related in any way, inference is impossible; but you do not state their relationship. You also do not specify the relationship between $p_k$ and $q_k$. You also describe "binomial distribution probabilities" in the title but I see no reference to a binomial distribution in your question. $\endgroup$
    – heropup
    Commented Aug 25, 2021 at 21:43
  • $\begingroup$ $X$ is sampled from a binomial distribution correpsonding to events $A$ and $B$. $A$ is just uniform distribution, while $B$ is an arbitrary distribution. I am loosely calling these distributions, but I am really talking about the marginal distributions of $X$. Without $q_k$ differing from $p_k$ you shouldn't be able to make an estimate, so you may assume that $q_k\neq p_k$ for all $k$. $\endgroup$
    – asd
    Commented Aug 25, 2021 at 21:45
  • $\begingroup$ I still do not understand what you mean. Events are subsets of the space of elementary outcomes. They are not themselves random variables nor do they have a distribution. $\endgroup$
    – heropup
    Commented Aug 25, 2021 at 21:47
  • $\begingroup$ See the above comment. I was speaking loosely by calling them distributions, they are just events. $\endgroup$
    – asd
    Commented Aug 25, 2021 at 21:48
  • $\begingroup$ You need to provide a concrete example of your model; e.g., $X \sim \operatorname{Binomial}(10, 0.2)$, $A = \{0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 7\}$, $B = \{2, 4, 9, 10\}$, from which we can compute $\alpha$ and $\beta$; then $(C \mid X = A) \sim \operatorname{DiscreteUniform}(N)$, $(C \mid X = B) \sim ???$. Your use of terminology is not consistent with standard statistical practice. $\endgroup$
    – heropup
    Commented Aug 25, 2021 at 21:56

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

I've thought about this more and if you look in the limit you can recover $\alpha$ exactly of course. The empirical probability you get from samples $r_k:=\mathbb{P}_e(Y=C_k)$ converges to the actual probability $\mathbb{P}(Y=C_k)$ by LLN.

$$\mathbb{P}(Y=C_k)=\mathbb{P}(X=A)\cdot\mathbb{P}(Y=C_k|X=A)+\mathbb{P}(X=B)\cdot\mathbb{P}(Y=C_k|X=B)$$

$$\mathbb{P}(Y=C_k)=\alpha/N+(1-\alpha)q_k$$

So if you look at the estimate $r_k\sim\alpha/N+(1-\alpha)q_k$ and solve for $\alpha$ you should get a good estimate:

$$\alpha\sim \frac{r_k-q_k}{\frac{1}{N}-q_k}.$$ The probability that $\alpha$ differs from this depends on the convergence behavior for LLN with discrete random variables $(X,Y)$. I guess this kinda thing is well-known by people, but I've forgotten what the optimal bounds are here.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ This last equation holding for all $k$ makes me wonder if you can actually solve for the $q_k$ without information about them (in the limit) if you have all of the $r_k$. $\endgroup$
    – asd
    Commented Aug 26, 2021 at 0:00

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .