Let $V\subseteq\mathbb A^n(K),W\subseteq\mathbb A^m(K)$ be affine algebraic varieties and let $k[V],k[W]$ be their coordinate rings. Let $\textrm{Hom}(V,W)$ be the set of morphisms (i.e. regular mappings) $V\rightarrow W$ and let $\textrm{Hom}(k[W],k[V])$ be the set of ring homomorphisms $k[W]\rightarrow k[V].$ Each morphism $f:V\rightarrow W$ induces a ring homomorphism $f^*$ acting like $f^*(\varphi)=\varphi\circ f$ where $\varphi\in k[W]$.

Show that $\textrm{Hom}(V,W)\overset{*}{\rightarrow}\textrm{Hom}(k[W],k[V])$ is bijective.

First I want to show $*$ is injective. Let $f\in\textrm{Hom}(V,W)$ be a non-zero morphism. Then there exists $x_0$ such that $f(x_0)\ne0.$

Since $\textrm{I}(f(x_0))$ is proper ideal, there exists $g\notin\textrm{I}(f(x_0))$, hence, $g\circ f$ is non-zero.

Is my proof of injectivity correct? And how can I show that $*$ is surjective?

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ $Hom(V, W)$ is not an abelian group. So 'injectivity' will require more argument. $\endgroup$ Aug 22 '21 at 17:48

First, I need to point out a common pitfall. The coordinate rings $k[W]$ and $k[V]$ actually have the structure of $k$-algebras. We definitely have a bijection between regular maps $f : V \to W$ and $k$-algebra homs from $k[W] \to k[V]$. But that does not mean we have a bijection between regular maps and ring homs. In fact, we don't. For a concrete example of a ring hom that isn't a $k$-algebra hom, see here. Ok, on with the show!

As is mentioned in the comments, we need a bit more of an argument to check injectivity. However your broad idea can still be salvaged:

First, let $f \neq g \in \text{Hom}(V,W)$. Since $f \neq g$, we can find an $x_0$ with $fx_0 \neq gx_0$. Then the maximal ideals corresponding to $fx_0$ and $gx_0$ in $K[W]$ are distinct, so we can find a function $\varphi \in K[W]$ which is in one ideal (say, $\mathfrak{m}_{fx_0}$) but not the other ($\mathfrak{m}_{gx_0}$). But now we see $\varphi f x_0 = 0$ and $\varphi g x_0$ is not $0$. So $f^* \varphi \neq g^* \varphi$, and $f^* \neq g^*$.

As for surjectivity, it's a bit harder to figure out without having seen the argument before. The idea is to use the coordinate functions on $W$ to tell us where a point in $V$ must be sent.

Let $\varphi : k[W] \to k[V]$, and write $k[W] = k[w_1, \ldots, w_n] / I(W)$. Recall in this context $w_i$ is the function sending a point in $W$ to its $i$th coordinate.

Now we define $v_i = \varphi w_i \in k[V]$. These assemble to give us a map $f : V \to \mathbb{A}^n$ defined by $f(p) = (v_1 p, v_2 p, \ldots, v_n p)$. You should meditate some on the construction of this map, and why it should be an obvious thing to consider. We're taking a point in $V$, and seeing where it must go if we want our map to be compatible with $\varphi$.

It's now routine to check that $f$ actually sends $V$ to $W$. Moreover, we can check (and you should) that $f^* = \varphi$. Though again, we cooked up $f$ to make this work.

I hope this helps ^_^


Injectivity: If $f, g: V\to W$ are such that $f^*=g^*$. Let $p\in V$. $p$ will correspond to an ideal $I_p:=(x_1-a_1,\dots, x_n-a_n)$.

$$f^*=g^*: k[y_1\dots, y_m]/I(W)\to k[x_1\dots, x_n]/I(V)$$

Thus, ${f^*}^{-1}(I_p/I(V))={g^*}^{-1}(I_p/I(V))$ in $k[W].$

$f(p)$ is given by the maximal ideal ${f^*}^{-1}(I_p/I(V))$ in $k[W]$, which will be by the Hilbert Nullstellensatz to $(y_1-b_1,\cdots, y_m-b_m)$ for some $b_i$'s. Similarly $g(p)$ is given by the maximal ideal ${g^*}^{-1}(I_p/I(V))$ in $k[W]$.

Thus, $f(p)=g(p)$.

Surjectivity: Let $$\psi: k[y_1\dots, y_m]/I(W)\to k[x_1\dots, x_n]/I(V).$$

Let $f_i:=\psi(y_i)$ be the polynomials in $x_i$'s.

Now $f_i$ 's define a morphism $f:V\to \mathbb{A}^m$ sending $$(b_1,\dots, b_n)\mapsto (f_1(\bar{b}),\dots, f_m(\bar{b})).$$

Now check that $f$ maps $V\subset \mathbb{A}^n$ into $W\subset \mathbb{A}^m$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.