Consider the following PDF:
$$w_{\alpha,\beta}(x):=\alpha \beta x^{\beta-1}e^{-\alpha x^{\beta}} \mathbf{1}_{(0,\infty)}(x)$$
This is the Weibull distribution often used in material science. Assume we know $\beta$ and we want to estimate $\alpha$. Let $X_1,\ldots X_n$ be i.i.d weibull-distributed.
- Find the MLE $\hat{\alpha}$ for the parameter $\alpha$.
- Find a $c \in \mathbb R$ such that $c \cdot \alpha $ is an unbiased estimator.
Question: The result I am getting for the MLE doesn't look correct but I don't know what I am doing wrong. For Part 2, do I just have to show that $\operatorname{E}(\hat{\alpha}-\alpha)=0$?
My attempt:
Step 1: Write down the ML function:
$$L(\alpha)=\prod_{i=1}^n \alpha \beta x_i^{\beta-1}e^{-\alpha x_i^{\beta}}$$
Step 2: Take the natural log:
$$ \begin{aligned}\ln(L(\alpha))&=\sum_{i=1}^n \ln\left(\alpha \beta x_i^{\beta-1}e^{-\alpha x_i^{\beta}} \right) \\[5pt] &=\sum_{i=1}^n \ln\left(\alpha\beta x_i^{\beta-1}\right)+\ln \left( e^{-\alpha x_i^{\beta}}\right) \\[5pt] &=\sum_{i=1}^n\ln\left(\alpha \right)+\ln(\beta)+(\beta-1)\ln\left(x_i \right)-\alpha x_i^{\beta} \end{aligned}$$
Step 3: Differentiate and set equal to zero:
$$\begin{aligned}&\frac{\partial }{\partial \alpha}\ln(L(\alpha))=\sum_{i=1}^n \frac{1}{\alpha}-x_i^{\beta}=0 \\[5pt] &\iff \sum_{i=1}^n\frac{1}{\alpha}=\sum_{i=1}^n x_i^{\beta} \\[5pt] & \iff \frac{n}{\alpha}=\sum_{i=1}^nx_i^{\beta} \iff \alpha=\frac{n}{\sum_{i=1}^nx_i^{\beta}}\end{aligned}$$
For part 2 I was thinking of setting $c=\alpha \bar{X}$, where $\bar{X}$ is the average of the $x_i^{\beta}$'s. Then it would follow that: $$E\left[\alpha \cdot \frac{1}{n} \cdot \sum_{i=1}^n x_i^{\beta} \cdot \frac{n}{\sum_{i=1}^n x_i^{\beta}}\right]=\alpha \\ \iff \alpha =\alpha $$
But I am not sure if am allowed to set $c$ equal to that.