Statement $1$: Given a non-constant map $f: (\mathbb R, \tau_{cocountable}) \to (\mathbb R, \tau_{cofinite})$, show $f$ is continuous iff, for each $y \in \mathbb R$, the set $f ^{–1}(\{y\})$ is countable
Proof of Statement $1$: Suppose $f$ is continuous. For each $y \in \mathbb R, \ \{y\}$ is $\tau_{cofinite}$-closed, so $f^{–1}(\{y\})$ must be $\tau_{cocountable}$-closed ($\ne \mathbb R$ since $f$ is non-constant), therefore $f^{–1}(\{y\})$ is countable. Suppose now $f^{–1}(\{y\})$ is countable for each $y \in \mathbb R$. For any closed $K \in (\mathbb R, \tau_{cofinite}), \ K$ is either $\mathbb R$ or finite. Now $f^{–1}(\mathbb R) = \mathbb R$ is $\tau_{cocountable}$-closed, and if $K$ is finite, then $f^{–1}(K) = \bigcup_{y \in K}f ^{–1}(\{y\})$ is a finite union of countable sets, therefore countable, therefore $\tau_{cocountable}$-closed again and hence $f$ is continuous.
My Questions about the proof above:
How does the bolded "therefore" above follow? By definition, any(?) subset $X$ in the domain of $f$ is of the form $\mathbb R = X \cup X^c$ where $X^c$ is the countable complement of $X$. But that makes $\mathbb R$ countable.
In the other direction, how does the italicized finite follow? If $K$ is finite, then $\mathbb R = K \cup K^c$ implies $\mathbb R$ is finite.
In general, does $\tau_{cocountable}$ contain countable sets and does $\tau_{cofinite}$ contain finite sets? And maybe trivially, how do we know $f^{-1}(\mathbb R) = \mathbb R?$
Question $2$:
Are the following pairs of spaces homeomorphic?
(i) $\mathbb Q \cup (0, 1)$ and $\mathbb R \setminus \mathbb Q$ (as subspaces of $(\mathbb R, \tau_{usual}))$;
(ii) $(\mathbb C, \tau_{disc})$ and $(\mathbb C, \tau_{cocountable})$;
(iii) a circle with one point removed (in $\mathbb R^2$ with $\tau_{usual}$) and $(\mathbb R, \tau_{usual})$;
(iv) $\mathbb N$ with topology $\{1, 2\}, \{3, 4\}, \{5, 6\}, \{7, 8\}, \ldots$ and all unions of these, and $\mathbb N$ with topology $\{1, 3\}, \{2, 4\}, \{5, 7\}, \{6, 8\}, \{9, 11\}, \{10, 12\}, \ldots$ and all unions of these.
The following have answers
(v) $(\mathbb R, \tau_{cocountable}), \ (\mathbb R, \tau_{cofinite})$
(vi) $\mathbb R^2$ and the surface of a sphere with one point removed (natural metric topologies here)
(vii) $(\mathbb Q,l_x), (\mathbb Q, l_y)$, where $x, y$ are two distinct rational numbers and $l_p$ is included-point topology
Book's answers to (v) and (vii):
(v) No. The statement ‘there is a countably infinite closed subset’ is (obviously) a homeomorphic invariant, is true in $(\mathbb R, \tau_{cocountable})$ and is false in $(\mathbb R, \tau_{cofinite})$
(vii) Yes. The map $h : \mathbb Q → \mathbb Q$ given by $h(x) = y, h(y) = x, h(z) = z$ when $z \ne x$ or $y$ is routinely checkable to be a homeomorphism.
My answers/questions regarding question $2$ above:
(i) $\mathbb Q, (0, 1)$ are not compact and so their union is not compact meaning there's no continuous inverse function from $\mathbb Q \cup (0, 1)$
(ii) Any function from a discrete space to an indiscrete space is continuous. Since idenity $i$ is continuous and bijective, $i$ should work here to show homeomorphism
(iii) I think this is a special case of Stereographic projection
(iv) Any inverse image of an open set in $\mathbb N$ is a union of $2$-sets. Since the given $2$-sets are open, their union is open as well. This works in both directions, so a continuous function with its continuous inverse likely exists. I am not sure how to find a concrete homeomorphism, but would $f(x, y) = (x, y – 1)$ if $y$ is odd and $f(x, y) = (x + 1, y)$ if $x$ is even work?
Are my answers to (i) through (iv) correct? If not (or if incomplete), how do I improve them?
(v) This question might be trivial, but I am still new to the very basics of topology. Consider $f: (\mathbb R, \tau_{cofinite}) \to (\mathbb R, \tau_{cocountable})$. Every $Y \in (\mathbb R, \tau_{cocountable})$ must have a pre-image $X \in (\mathbb R, \tau_{cofinite})$. By definition, every $X$ is open, but for $f$ to be continuous $X$ must be cocountable. Correct?
(vi) It's yet another special case of Stereographic projection. Correct?
(vii) Is $h(y)$ a typo? Did they mean $h^{-1}(y)?$
Thanks.