3
$\begingroup$

Question: Let $f_n:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}$ be measurable functions such that $f_n(x)\rightarrow 0$ as $n\rightarrow\infty$ for every $x\in\mathbb{R}$. Show there exists a positive measurable function $h$ such that $f_nh\rightarrow 0$ in measure.

My thoughts: I had two ideas for how to approach this problem: First, I could find some function $h$, in terms of $f_n$, that converges to $0$ pointwise almost everywhere which would then imply convergence to $0$ in measure. Or, second, use function $h$ (again, I feel like I need it in terms of $f_n$) and show that $f_nh$ converges to $0$ in $L_2$ (by integrating), thus in $L_1$, and so in measure. However, I am struggling to find such an $h$. Maybe it would be best to just try and do it directly by trying to show $\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}m(x\in\mathbb{R}:|f_n(x)h(x)|\geq\epsilon)=0$ for all $\epsilon>0$.
Any help would be greatly appreciated! Thank you

$\endgroup$
0

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

It seems that we can get a stronger result that there exists a positive measurable function $h$ such that there is a measurable set $A \subseteq \mathbb{R}$ such that $m(\mathbb{R} \setminus A) = 0$ and $f_n h \to 0$ uniformly on $A$. Note that this clearly implies that $f_n h \to 0$ in measure.

Denote by $m$ the standard Lebesgue measure on $\mathbb{R}$ and take any expression $\mathbb{R} = \cup_{i=1}^{\infty} E_i$ where each $E_i$ is measurable and $m(E_i) < \infty$ (for example by bounded intervals $E_i$'s). For each $j \geq 1$, we have, by the basic standard theorem of Egorov (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egorov%27s_theorem), that there exists a measurable subset $A_{ij} \subseteq E_i$ with $m(E_i \setminus A_{ij}) < 1/j$ and $f_n \to 0$ uniformly on $A_{ij}$. Then note that $m(E_i \setminus \cup_{j=1}^{\infty} A_{ij}) = 0$. Taking $A = \cup_{i,j \geq 1} A_{ij}$, we have also that $\displaystyle \mathbb{R} \setminus A = (\bigcup_i E_i )\setminus A \subseteq \bigcup_{i \geq 1} (E_i \setminus \bigcup_{j \geq 1} A_{ij})$, so that $m(\mathbb{R} \setminus A) = 0$. Since $\{ A_{ij} \}_{i,j \geq 1}$ is a countable family of sets, we can reindex this so that $A = \cup_{i=1}^{\infty} A_i$ where each $A_i$ is measurable and $f_n \to 0$ uniformly on each $A_i$.

Set $B_k = \{ x \, | \, \sup_n |f_n(x)| \leq k \}$. Since $f_n \to 0$ pointwise on $\mathbb{R}$, for each $x \in \mathbb{R}$ we must have $\sup_n |f_n(x)| < \infty$ (why?), so that $\mathbb{R} = \cup_{k=1}^{\infty} B_k$.

Now take $\displaystyle h = \sum_{i,j \geq 1} \frac{1}{j2^{ij}} \chi_{A_i \cap B_j} + \chi_{\mathbb{R} \setminus A}$, where as usual $\chi_E$ denotes the indicator function on $E$, i.e. $1$ on $E$ and $0$ elsewhere. Note that $\displaystyle \sum_{i,j \geq 1} \frac{1}{j 2^{ij}} \leq \sum_{i,j} \frac{1}{2^{ij}} = \sum_i \sum_j \frac{1}{2^{ij}} = \sum_i \frac{1}{2^i - 1} \leq \sum_i \frac{1}{2^{i-1}} = 2 < \infty$ and that $h > 0$ everywhere on $\mathbb{R}$, so $h$ is a positive (real-valued) measurable function on $\mathbb{R}$.

Given $\epsilon > 0$, we can take some large positive integer $s$ so that $\displaystyle \frac{4}{2^s - 1} < \frac{\epsilon}{2}$. With this choice, we have

$$\sum_{i \geq 1} \sum_{j \geq s} \frac{1}{2^{ij}} = \sum_{i=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{2^{is} - 2^{is - i}} = \sum_{i \geq 1} \frac{1}{2^{is - i}(2^i - 1)} \leq \sum_{i \geq 1} \frac{1}{2^{is -i}(2^{i-1})} = \sum_{i \geq 1} \frac{1}{2^{is - 1}} = 2 \sum_{i \geq 1} \frac{1}{2^{is}} = \frac{2}{2^s - 1} < \frac{\epsilon}{4}.$$

Now,

$\displaystyle |f_n h| \leq \sum_{1 \leq i,j \leq s} \frac{|f_n|}{j 2^{ij}} \chi_{A_i \cap B_j} + \sum_{i \geq s, j \geq 1} \frac{|f_n|}{j 2^{ij}} \chi_{A_i \cap B_j} + \sum_{j \geq s, i \geq } \frac{|f_n|}{j 2^{ij}} \chi_{A_i \cap B_j} + |f_n| \chi_{\mathbb{R} \setminus A} \leq \sum_{1 \leq i,j \leq s} \frac{|f_n|}{j 2^{ij}} \chi_{A_i \cap B_j} + \sum_{i \geq s, j \geq 1} \frac{1}{2^{ij}} \chi_{A_i \cap B_j} + \sum_{j \geq s, i \geq 1} \frac{1}{2^{ij}} \chi_{A_i \cap B_j} + |f_n| \chi_{\mathbb{R} \setminus A}.$

In the very latter expression, the middle two terms sum to something smaller than $\frac{\epsilon}{2}$, and in the first term, $\sum_{1 \leq i,j \leq s} \frac{|f_n|}{j 2^{ij}} \chi_{A_i \cap B_j}$, we have uniform convergence to $0$ (it's a finite sum of sequences of functions that converge uniformly to $0$), so there exists $N$ such that if $n \geq N$ then $\sum_{1 \leq i,j \leq s} \frac{|f_n|}{j 2^{ij}} \chi_{A_i \cap B_j} < \epsilon / 2$. So that for $n \geq N$, we have $|f_n(x) h(x)| < \epsilon$ for all $x \in A$. So $f_n h \to 0$ uniformly on $A$.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you so much for the elaborate answer! I was wondering, even though this rersult is stronger, would there be a nice (concise) way to do the original problem? $\endgroup$
    – User7238
    Jul 1, 2021 at 22:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.