I am reading about classifications of groups of order $30$ and $12$ in Dummit and Foote. I understand the general procedure for such classifications. However, I have trouble recognizing the resulting semidirect products as "its more descriptive form"; for example, as a direct product of a cyclic group and a dihedral group. Below are the specific examples:

  1. Let $G$ be a group of order $30$. Let $H = \langle a\rangle \times \langle b \rangle \cong Z_5 \times Z_3$ be normal subgroup of $G$ of order $15$. Let $K = \langle k \rangle$ be the Sylow $2$- subgroup of $G$.

Let $\phi_1: K \to \mbox{Aut}(H)$ that maps $k$ to $\{a \mapsto a, b \mapsto b^{-1}\}$. Then $G_1 = H\rtimes_{\phi_1}K \cong Z_5 \times D_6$ (note that in this semidirect product $k$ centralizes the element $a$ of $H$ of order $5$, so the factorization as a direct product is $\langle a \rangle \times \langle b,k \rangle$).

Let $\phi_2: K \to \mbox{Aut}(H)$ that maps $k$ to $\{a \mapsto a^{-1}, b \mapsto b\}$. Then $G_2 = H\rtimes_{\phi_2}K \cong Z_3 \times D_{10}$ (note that in this semidirect product $k$ centralizes the element $b$ of $H$ of order $3$, so the factorization as a direct product is $\langle b \rangle \times \langle a,k \rangle$).

Let $\phi_3: K \to \mbox{Aut}(H)$ that maps $k$ to $\{a \mapsto a^{-1}, b \mapsto b^{-1}\}$. Then $G_3 = H\rtimes_{\phi_2}K \cong D_{30}$.

  1. Let $G$ be a group of order $12$. Let $V$ be a Sylow $2$-subgroup of $G$ and $T$ be a Sylow $3$-subgroup of $G$. Suppose $T \trianglelefteq G$ and $V = \langle a\rangle \times \langle b \rangle \cong Z_2 \times Z_2$. Put $\mbox{Aut}(T) = \langle \lambda \rangle \cong Z_2$. Then there are three nontrivial homomorphisms from $V$ into $\mbox{Aut}(T)$ determined by specifying their kernels as one of the three subgroups of order $2$ in $V$. For example, $\phi_1(a) = \lambda$ and $\phi_1(b) = \lambda$ has kernel $\langle ab \rangle$. If $\phi_2$ and $\phi_3$ have kernels $\langle a \rangle$ and $\langle b \rangle$, respectively, then the resulting three semidirect products are all isomorphic to $S_3 \times Z_2$, where the $Z_2$ direct factor is the kernel of $\phi_i$. For example, $T \rtimes_{\phi_1} V = \langle a, T \rangle \times \langle ab \rangle$.

Can someone offer a more detailed explanation for the bold parts? Are there any results that I am not aware of that make the conclusion follow easily?


1 Answer 1


$H$ is a subgroup of $G$ which is the direct product of $C_5$ and $C_3$. Both $C_5$ and $C_3$ have an automorphism of order $2$, which acts as $\phi(x)=x^{-1}$.

Note that $G/N$ has order $2$, so either $C_G(N)=N$ or $C_G(N)=G$. In the latter case, you get a direct product $C_5 \times C_3 \times C_2 = C_{30}$. So assume that $C_G(N)=N$. Now you can define a map $\phi: C_2 \to \operatorname{Out}(H)$ as the map defined by the action of $G/N$ by conjugation on $N$ (this is the NC theorem). There are three possibilities for $G/N = C_2$:

  • It acts trivially on $C_5$, but not on $C_3$. In this case you get $C_5 \times (C_3 \rtimes C_2) = C_5 \times D_6$.
  • It acts trivially on $C_3$, but not on $C_5$. In this case you get $C_3 \times (C_5 \rtimes C_2) = C_5 \times D_{10}$.
  • It acts non-trivially on both $C_5$ and $C_3$. In this case, you get $(C_5 \times C_3) \rtimes C_2 = C_{15}\rtimes C_2 = D_{30}$.

Essentially, you are looking at how a $C_2$ can act on two factors, each of which has a single automorphism of order two (so the action is either that automorphism, or trivial).

For the second one, it's the same logic, but now you are looking at maps $\phi: C_2 \times C_2 \to C_2$ (where the latter is $\operatorname{Aut}(C_3)$). Let $C_2 \times C_2 = \langle a \rangle \times \langle b \rangle$. Take the preimage of $C_2 = \operatorname{Aut}(C_3)$: it can be one of three subgroups $\langle a \rangle$, $\langle b \rangle$, $\langle ab \rangle$. Call it $T$. Whatever it is, you can still write:

$$ G = (C_3 \rtimes T) \times C_2$$

as follows

  • $ G = (C_3 \rtimes \langle a \rangle) \times \langle b \rangle$
  • $ G = (C_3 \rtimes \langle b \rangle) \times \langle a \rangle$
  • $ G = (C_3 \rtimes \langle ab \rangle) \times \langle a \rangle$

and so all the semidirect products are isomorphic.

  • $\begingroup$ As a tl;dr, if $G=H \rtimes_\phi T$, then the direct factors of $H$ on which $\phi$ acts trivially remain direct factors of $G$. $\endgroup$ Jun 27, 2021 at 10:56
  • $\begingroup$ By $N$, do you mean $H$, the subgroup of order 15? Can you explain more about the first two sentences of the second paragraph? Why does index=2 imply the two possibilities about the centralizer of H? And why does $C_G(H) = G$ imply $G$ is abelian? $\endgroup$ Jun 27, 2021 at 11:37
  • $\begingroup$ In addition, for the second one, the book seems to be saying $G = (C_3 \rtimes C_2) \times K$, where $C_2 = \langle a \rangle$ or $\langle b \rangle$ and $K$ is the kernel of $\phi$. This looks slightly different from yours. Are the two isomorphic? $\endgroup$ Jun 27, 2021 at 11:42
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @mashedcarrots Because since $H$ is abelian $H \leq C_G(H)$, and $[G:H]=2$. So it either $H$ or $G$, there are no intermediate subgroups. It does not immediately imply that $G$ is abelian. However, it does tell you that the semidirect product is actually direct... and hence that $G$ is abelian. $\endgroup$ Jun 27, 2021 at 12:08
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @mashedcarrots the direct factor acts trivially on $C_3$, and hence it is in the kernel of the map $\phi: C_2 \times C_2 \to \operatorname{Aut}(C_2)$. So yes, they are isomorphic (they are in fact the same group). $\endgroup$ Jun 27, 2021 at 12:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.