6
$\begingroup$

Let $\mu$ be a complex Radon measure (it's real and imaginary parts are signed radon measures) on a locally compact Hausdorff space $X$. Is its total variation, $|\mu|$, Radon?

I define $|\mu|$ in the followin way, write $d\mu=fd\alpha$, with $\alpha$ any $\sigma$finite positive measure, the $d|\mu|=|f|d\alpha$ defines $|\mu|$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ You should probably explain how you define $|\mu|$. Some people would write $\mu = (\mu_1 - \mu_2) + i (\mu_3 - \mu_4)$ with $\mu_k \geq 0$ and define $|\mu| = \mu_1 + \mu_2 + \mu_3 + \mu_4$ which is of course Radon. $\endgroup$ – Martin Jun 12 '13 at 2:46
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, I edited it and added the definition i'm working with. Is the definition you wrote equivalent to the one I wrote? $\endgroup$ – Bill Jun 12 '13 at 2:54
  • $\begingroup$ Yes it is (provided the decomposition of the signed measures are the Jordan decompositions). First treat the case where $\mu$ is a signed measure. Then show that real and imaginary part of $\mu$ have real and imaginary part of $f$ as Radon-Nikodym derivative with respect to $\alpha$. $\endgroup$ – Martin Jun 12 '13 at 3:02
  • $\begingroup$ Jus to check that i'm followin you: Isn't there a constant somewhere, given that $|z|$ isn't $|Re(z)|+|Im(z)|$ but $\sqrt{Re(z)^2 + Im(z)^2}$ @Martin $\endgroup$ – Bill Jun 12 '13 at 3:26
  • $\begingroup$ I'm sorry but I don't follow hoy can you take a decomposition like that. For example if $\mu_{1}(X)$ is to be zero, $\mu_1$ is a positive measure, then $\mu_{1}=0$. @Martin $\endgroup$ – Bill Jun 12 '13 at 3:39
3
$\begingroup$

Ok, following @Martin hint, here's why $|\mu|$ is Radon.

  1. Write $\mu=(\mu_1 - \mu_2) +i (\mu_3-\mu_4)$ Using Jordan's decomposition.

  2. Show that there are positive constants $c_1,c_2$ such that

$c_1 (\mu_1+\mu_2+\mu_3+\mu_4)\leq |\mu|\leq c_2(\mu_1+\mu_2+\mu_3+\mu_4)$

  1. Show that when $\mu=\mu_1-\mu_2$ is real, $|\mu|=\mu_1+\mu_2$

  2. Show that for a finite positive borel measure $\mu$, $\mu$ is Radon iff for every borelian $E$, $\epsilon >0$ there are $V,K$, $V$ open, $K$ compact, $K\subseteq E\subseteq V$ such that $\mu(V\setminus K)<\epsilon$.

This actually shows that $|\mu|$ Radon implies $\mu$ Radon

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ My apologies for all this silliness in the comments. You are absolutely right the "identification" of $|\mu|$ with $\mu_1 + \mu_2+\mu_3+\mu_4$ is sheer nonsense. Maybe another way of looking at this: if $\alpha$ is a Radon measure and $f$ is a (locally) integrable function then $f d\alpha$ is a Radon measure. If $f$ is integrable then $|f|$ is integrable, so $|\mu| = |f|\,d\alpha$ is a Radon measure. $\endgroup$ – Martin Jun 12 '13 at 11:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.