I'm confused about the covariant derivative of the Riemannian curvature tensor.


Let $\nabla$ be the Levi-Civita connection of some Riemannian metric. Let $R$ be the Riemannian curvature tensor, defined by $$ R(X,Y)Z = \nabla_X \nabla_Y Z - \nabla_Y \nabla_X Z - \nabla_{[X,Y]} Z. $$ The only definition of 'covariant derivative of a tensor' I can find is for tensors defined as maps to $C^{\infty}(M)$. I understand that $R$ is a $(1,3)$-tensor (in Lee's notation, i.e. it can be viewed as mapping 1 covector-field and 3 vector-fields to a smooth function). However I don't know how to use this to make sense of the LHS of equation $(1)$ below.


Does it hold that $$ \tag{1} (\nabla_W R)(X,Y)(Z) = \nabla_W (R(X,Y)Z)? $$ If so, I would be interested in seeing a derivation of this equality from the 'covariant derivative of a $(1,3)$-tensor'-point of view, if that makes sense.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ To make it into an $(1,3)$ tensor one uses $\omega$, an one-form and three vector fields $X,Y,Z$ to get $$\omega(R(X,Y)Z)$$ this is locally a tetra-linear transformation $$T_pM^*\times T_pM\times T_pM\times T_pM\to\mathbb R.$$ $\endgroup$
    – janmarqz
    Jun 22, 2021 at 16:31

1 Answer 1


No, it does not hold. As a tensor, $R$ satisfies Leibniz's rule: $$ \nabla_{W}\left(R(X,Y)Z\right) = \left(\nabla_WR\right)(X,Y)Z + R\left(\nabla_WX,Y\right)Z + R\left(X,\nabla_WY\right)Z + R(X,Y)\nabla_WZ, $$ and hence, $$ \left(\nabla_WR\right)(X,Y)Z = \nabla_{W}\left(R(X,Y)Z\right) - R\left(\nabla_WX,Y\right)Z - R\left(X,\nabla_WY\right)Z - R(X,Y)\nabla_WZ. $$


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.