0
$\begingroup$

What's wrong in the evaluation of the limit of the sequence $$a_{n+1} = 4a_n+3$$ when $a_0$(first term) $=1$

Taking limits to infinty on both sides :

$\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}a_{n+1} = 4 \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}a_n + 3$

But $\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}a_{n+1} =\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty}a_n$

So we get limit as $-1$. However this limit can't be negative as the sequence is increasing. Can someone point out the error with an example of a correct evaluation technique?

$\endgroup$
3
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ You are taking limit of $(a_n)$ and doing arithmetics with it without knowing it exists in $\mathbb{R}$. $\endgroup$ Jun 18 at 14:29
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ ...and, in fact and as continuation of the first comment, what you've proved is that the limit of that sequence, even if it exists (and it does in a generalized sense), cannot be a finite one. $\endgroup$
    – DonAntonio
    Jun 18 at 14:56
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ As a side note: You have also discovered that $-1$ is a fixed point of your transformation, in other words, if you were to start for instance with $a_1=-1$, you would have $a_n=-1$ for all $n$. $\endgroup$ Jun 18 at 15:12
2
$\begingroup$

Indeed, we have $a_{n+1}+1=4(a_n+1)$, which means that the sequence $\{a_n+1\}_{n\geq 0}$ is a geometric series, therefore, $$a_n+1=2\cdot 4^{n}.$$ So $$a_n=2\cdot 4^{n}-1.$$ Obviously $\lim\limits_{n\to\infty}a_n=+\infty$, so we can't take limits as you have done above.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.