2
$\begingroup$

In my textbook, the author states that $$ \iint_R f(r\cos\theta,r\sin \theta)r\,dr\,d\theta =\iint_{G(R)} f(x,y)\,dy\,dx, $$ where $G(r,\theta)=(r\cos\theta, r\sin \theta)$ and he says that this is the formula for the change of variables between rectangular coordinates and polar ones.

But for me, it doesn't look right, if we want to change coordinates then the formula should be like this $$ \iint_R f(x,y)\,dy\,dx=\iint_{G(R)} f(r\cos\theta,r\sin \theta)r\,dr\,d\theta. $$

Am I right? or are both formulas the same thing?

This is a picture from the textbook, it says that the map $G$ takes rectangular to polar enter image description here

$\endgroup$
6
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ What is crucial here is that you said $G(r,\theta) = (r\cos\theta,r\sin\theta) = (x,y),$ i.e. $G$ takes polar coordinates as its input and the output is rectangular coordinates. $\qquad$ $\endgroup$ Jun 17 at 23:31
  • $\begingroup$ No, i didn't say that, $G$ is a map that takes rectangular coordinates to polar coordinates @MichaelHardy $\endgroup$
    – Yassir
    Jun 17 at 23:55
  • $\begingroup$ I never said you said that. I merely pointed out that that is the crucial central fact to be noted here. $\endgroup$ Jun 17 at 23:56
  • $\begingroup$ You didn't understand me, I mean that $G$ is actually a map that takes rectangular coordinates to polar coordinates, this is what i think, is it right? @MichaelHardy $\endgroup$
    – Yassir
    Jun 18 at 0:06
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Since $G(r,\theta) = (x,y),$ $G$ takes polar coordinates to rectangular coordinates. Are you asking whether it goes in both directions? $\endgroup$ Jun 18 at 0:14
0
$\begingroup$

The first formula is right, but you need to undestand what the symbols mean.

To simplify, the change of variable to polar coordinates works when you are integrating over a polar rectangle; that is, $$ G(R)=\{(r\cos\theta,r\sin\theta):\ (r,\theta)\in R\}. $$ Then you have $$ \iint_{G(R)} f(x,y)\,dy\,dx=\iint_R f(r\cos\theta,r\sin \theta)r\,dr\,d\theta $$ and your integral became a double integral over a rectangle.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

No, of course both cannot be right. The formula in the textbook is right. The way I "remember" the formula is that if $(r,\theta)\in R$ then this is my "polar coordinate space" so $(x,y)=(r\cos\theta,r\sin\theta)=G(r,\theta)$ are the corresponding cartesian coordinates so they have to lie in $G(R)$.


In general (under appropriate hypotheses) the change of variables formula is $$ \int_{G(R)} f(\xi)\,d\xi = \int_{R}f(G(\zeta))\cdot \left|\det DG(\zeta)\right|\,d\zeta $$ Here, we interpret it as $\zeta\in R$ and the "substitution" is $\xi=G(\zeta)$ so we must have $\xi\in G(R)$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.