I understand that

$\log_b n = x \iff b^x = n$

But all examples I see is with values that I naturally know how to calculate (like $2^x = 8, x=3$)

What if I don't? For example, how do I solve for $x$ when:

$$\log_{1.03} 2 = x\quad ?$$

$$\log_{8} 33 = x\quad ?$$

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Really, the only way to go about solving logarithms in most cases is by using a calculator. You could solve a rounded answer by hand using a Taylor series expansion, but that would be exhausting. $\endgroup$ – Cisplatin Jun 9 '13 at 14:57
  • $\begingroup$ You can get rid of the weird logarithm base by using your first equation gong left to right; then go right to left using logarithms you can access on your calculator $\endgroup$ – DJohnM Jun 9 '13 at 14:58
  • $\begingroup$ Fabricio: How does the accepted answer allows you "to find the value without a calculator"? $\endgroup$ – Did Jun 9 '13 at 16:09

The logarithm $\log_{b} (x)$ can be computed from the logarithms of $x$ and $b$ with respect to a positive base $k$ using the following formula:

$$\log_{b} (x) = \frac{\log_{k} (x)}{\log_{k} (b)}.$$

So your examples can be solved in the following way with a calculator:

$$x = \log_{1.03} (2) = \frac{\log_{10} (2)}{\log_{10} (1.03)} = \frac{0.301}{0.013} = 23.450, $$

$$x = \log_{8} (33) = \frac{\log_{10} (33)}{\log_{10} (8)} = \frac{1.519}{0.903} = 1.681.$$

If you know that $b$ and $x$ are both powers of some $k$, then you can evaluate the logarithm without a calculator by the power identity of logarithms, e.g.,

$$x = \log_{81} (27) = \frac{\log_{3} (27)}{\log_{3} (81)} = \frac{\log_{3} (3^3)}{\log_{3} (3^4)} = \frac{3 \cdot \log_{3} (3)}{4 \cdot \log_{3} (3)} = \frac{3}{4}.$$


method 1: use a calculator

method 2 (more fun): $\log_b a=\frac{\ln b}{\ln a}$

To calculate natural logs, if $|x|<1$ use the power series $\ln (x+1)=x-\frac{x^2}{2}+\frac{x^3}{3}-...$ and if not find the log of the reciprocal and subtract from zero. Powers of $x$ can be calculated by convolving as power series in $10$.

  • $\begingroup$ I'm very 'noob' with all this. Can you provide a link where I can understand all these matters? $\endgroup$ – Fabricio Jun 9 '13 at 15:09

There's actually nothing to solve here. You have an exact expression for $x$ in each case- you may not know exactly what number it corresponds to, just like you might not know what the square root of three equals when you solve something like $x^2=3$ but it's still just a number- in the first case, it would be the power to which I raise 1.03 to get 2 which is approximately 23.45


Starting with :$$\log_{1.03} 2 = x$$This is exactly the same as $$1.03^x=2$$ now take logarithms of both sides$$x \times \log(1.03)=\log(2)$$ Now, use your calculator

  • $\begingroup$ Isn't there how to calculate without the calculator? I want to find the value without a calculator. $\endgroup$ – Fabricio Jun 9 '13 at 15:06
  • $\begingroup$ @AmWhy: I wanted to show where the substitution you used (the correct one, of course) came from... $\endgroup$ – DJohnM Jun 9 '13 at 15:20
  • $\begingroup$ Good point! ;-) $\endgroup$ – Namaste Jun 9 '13 at 15:21
  • $\begingroup$ I just touched up the formatting in your answer, by adding two backslashes. Hope you don't mind! $\endgroup$ – Namaste Jun 9 '13 at 15:26

$$\log_bn=\frac{\ln n}{\ln b}=\frac{\log_{10}n}{\log_{10}b}=\frac{\log_2n}{\log_2b}=\ldots$$ Edit: Now added in a comment:

I want to find the value without a calculator.

...Which is an entirely new take on the question.

To get $x=\log_{1.03}2$, one could compute the successive powers of $1.03$. If $1.03^n\lt2\lt1.03^{n+1}$, then $n\lt x\lt n+1$. The rest depends on your ability to compute $1.03^n$ for $n$ in the $20$-$30$ range... but this yields $n=23$.

Another approach is to use power series, in this case $x=y/z$ with $y=\ln2$ and $z=\ln1.03$. Using the expansion $\log1+t=\sum\limits_{n\geqslant1}(-1)^{n-1}\frac{t^n}n$, one gets $$ y=-\ln\left(1-\tfrac12\right)=\sum_{n\geqslant1}\frac1{n2^n},\qquad z=\ln(1+.03)=\sum\limits_{n\geqslant1}(-1)^{n-1}\frac{(.03)^n}n. $$ Keeping $9$ terms in $y$ and $2$ terms in $z$ yields an error of at most $10^{-4}$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.