Letting $x=\tan(u)$, $$\int\frac{1}{1+x^2} \, dx=\int\frac{1}{1+\tan(u)^2}\sec^2(u) \, du=u+k=\arctan(x)+k$$ Also, $$\int\frac{1}{1+x^2} \, dx=\int\frac{1}{(x-i)(x+i)} \, dx=\frac{1}{2i}\int\frac{1}{(x-i)}-\frac{1}{(x+i)} \, dx$$ $$=\frac{1}{2i}\left(\ln(x-i)-\ln(x+i)\right)+c$$ $$=\frac{1}{2i}\ln \left(\frac{x-i}{x+i} \right)+c$$ Giving $$\arctan(x)=\frac{1}{2i}\ln \left(\frac{x-i}{x+i} \right)+q$$

Why is this correct? What is the nature of $q$ (is it 'flexible' so the equality doesn't really mean much)?

I think it probably has something to do with the relationship between $\log(z)$ and $\arg(z)$, but $\arg(z\pm i)$ is hard to calculate neatly.

  • $\begingroup$ $e^{iz} = \cos z+i\sin z$. I've posted a fairly short argument based on that. $\endgroup$ Jun 7 '13 at 22:29
  • $\begingroup$ It would be a nice exercise to plug in x = 1 on both sides of that equation. arctan(1) is ofcourse a well known value. Try to get that value from the right side too... $\endgroup$
    – imranfat
    Jun 7 '13 at 23:16
  • $\begingroup$ Are there typos in the u-substitution? $\endgroup$
    – DJohnM
    Jun 7 '13 at 23:52
  • $\begingroup$ Don't think so, what would be incorrect? $\endgroup$
    – imranfat
    Jun 8 '13 at 0:15
  • $\begingroup$ Well. I'm seeing x replaced with tan(x), and not all the x's substituted out of the integrand. $\endgroup$
    – DJohnM
    Jun 8 '13 at 0:58

The basic identity used here was discovered in the 18th century by Leonhard Euler: $$ e^{iz} = \cos z+i\sin z $$ where of course the cosine and the sine are of $x$ in radians.

It follows that $\cos z = \dfrac{e^{iz}+e^{-iz}}{2}$ and $\sin z = \dfrac{e^{iz}-e^{-iz}}{2i}$.

Therefore $$ a= \tan z = \frac{e^{iz}-e^{-iz}}{i(e^{iz}+e^{-iz})} = -i\frac{e^{2iz}-1}{e^{2iz}+1} = -i\frac{b-1}{b+1}. $$ $$ \begin{align} a & = -i\frac{b-1}{b+1} \\[10pt] (b+1)a & = -i(b-1) \\[10pt] b(i+a) & = i-a \\[10pt] b & = \frac{i-a}{i+a} \\[10pt] e^{2iz} & = \frac{i-a}{i+a} \\[10pt] 2iz & = \log \frac{i-a}{i+a} \end{align} $$ The logarithm, like the arctangent, is "multiple-valued".

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Thank you, it's nice to have things explicitly stated from the basics. $\endgroup$
    – Meow
    Jun 7 '13 at 22:33

We have that $$i\sin z=\sinh iz$$ $$\cos z=\cosh iz$$

This means that $$i\tan z=\tanh iz$$

But $$\tanh^{-1}z=\frac 1 2\log\left(\frac{1+z}{1-z}\right)$$

  • $\begingroup$ Does that definition for $\tanh^{-1}(z)$ come from $\tanh(z)= \frac{e^z-e^{-z}}{e^z+e^{-z}}$? That's the problem I was having. $\endgroup$
    – Meow
    Jun 7 '13 at 22:10
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Alyosha Yes. Actually, it is easier yo use $$\tanh z=\frac{e^{2z}-1}{e^{2z}+1}$$ to find the inverse. $\endgroup$
    – Pedro Tamaroff
    Jun 7 '13 at 22:11

This is correct, and by letting $x$ tend to $+\infty$ you can find the constant term: $$\arctan(x) = \frac{1}{2i} \log(\frac{x-i}{x+i}) + \frac{\pi}{2},$$ since $\log(\frac{x-i}{x+i})$ tends to $\log(1) = 0$ and $\arctan(x)$ tends to $\pi / 2$.

This is valid for $x > 0$. Unfortunately, there is a difficulty with the $\log$ function at $-1$, and for $x < 0$ we get the formula $$\arctan(x) = \frac{1}{2i} \log(\frac{x-i}{x+i}) - \frac{\pi}{2}$$ by a similar argument.

That the logarithm and inverse trigonometric functions are related shouldn't be surprising, though. Remember Euler's formula: $e^{ix} = \cos(x) + i \sin(x)$ that relates the exponential to the trigonometric functions.

  • $\begingroup$ Surely the logarithmic term will be multivalued? Or this covered by the fact the inverse tangent is also multivalued? (Infact, now I think about it, it is indeed) $\endgroup$
    – Andrew D
    Jun 7 '13 at 22:04
  • $\begingroup$ @AndrewD You're right, both are multivalued, but unfortunately not in quite the same way $\endgroup$
    – Cocopuffs
    Jun 7 '13 at 22:17

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.