I need a (very) intuitive explanation of fundamental theorem of calculus. I'm aware this question has been asked before but I believe I have a unique specific question.  I have read, and believe I understand the proof of:
$$ \int_{a}^{b}\ f'(x){\mathrm{d} x} = f(b)-f(a) .$$
A very good explanation and proof is given by littleO at Why does the fundamental theorem of calculus work?
I'm sure there are other good proofs.  He points out that "the total change is the sum of all the little changes".
I understand.  I want to step back a bit and ask, why on earth would you expect that knowing something about the end points (the anti-derivatives at a and b), would tell you all you need to know about a property of the entire thing (the area under the curve).  It doesn't matter if the function is $f(x) = 1$; $f(x) = 2x$ or $f(x) = 100 * x^{99}$.  The area under the curve will be the same from 0 to 1, and we can figure that out just from knowledge of just the end points.  What is the intuition?
Put another way, I (believe) I understand the proof, but I'm wondering why one should expect that knowledge of the end points tell us all we need to know about a property that has to deal with the entire interval (the area under the curve).  I'm hoping insight might prepare me for ideas in physics about the surface of a ball telling us what we need to know about every point inside the ball.
Thanks
 A: One way of thinking about it is:
$$I=\int_a^bf'(x)\,dx=\int_a^b\frac{df}{dx}dx$$
now let $u=f\Rightarrow \frac{du}{dx}=\frac{df}{dx}\Rightarrow dx=du\frac{dx}{df}$ now change the limits and sub in:
$$I=\int_{f(a)}^{f(b)}\frac{df}{dx}\frac{dx}{df}du=\int_{f(a)}^{f(b)}du=u|_{f(a)}^{f(b)}=f(b)-f(a)$$

EDIT
In terms of why the antiderivative would tell us the area of the whole thing, It might make some sense to think of the antiderivative as the area from zero up to a given point, in other words:
$$\int_0^xf(X)dX=F(x)-F(0)$$
and now from one point to another would just be:
$$\int_a^bf(x)dx=\int_0^bf(x)dx-\int_0^af(x)dx=[F(b)-F(0)]-[F(a)-F(0)]=F(b)-F(a)$$
We can thinking of it the opposite way too, $F'(x)=f(x)$, or the function is just the derivative of its antiderivative, meaning the function gives us the rate of change of its area and when we integrate it (sum it over a continuous interval) we are getting the total change of area
A: Suppose you have a bunch of numbers $y_1,y_2,\dots,y_n$, and you want to add them all up, but you don't know how. I tell you to do the following. Start with some arbitrary number $s_0$, then add $y_1,y_2,\dots$ to it one by one:
$$\begin{align}
s_1 &= s_0 + y_1, \\
s_2 &= s_1 + y_2, \\
&\vdots \\
s_n &= s_{n-1} + y_n.
\end{align}$$
Then, I claim, the sum you want is simply $s_n - s_0$.
Now meditate upon your original questions:

I want to step back a bit and ask, why on earth would you expect that knowing something about the end points ([the values $s_0$ and $s_n$]), would tell you all you need to know about a property of the entire thing ([the sum of all the numbers]). It doesn't matter if the [numbers are $y_i=1$; $y_i=2i$ or $y_i=100i^{99}$]. The [sum] will be the same from [$1$ to $n$], and we can figure that out just from knowledge of just the end points. What is the intuition?

