3
$\begingroup$

I am reading Brian Hall's Lie Groups, Lie Algebras, and Representation Theory. His Prop. 4.36 reads

If $G$ is a compact matrix Lie group, $G$ has the complete reducibility property.

The "complete reducibility property" means that every finite representation (of $G$) is completely reducible (i.e., is equivalent to a direct sum of irreducible representations). His proof invokes Haar measure, which he (admittedly) does not prove the existence of. He also uses (again without proof) that the Haar measure of a compact group is finite.

Is there a proof that does not require Haar measure or integration on manifolds?

In particular, the fact that we are only interested in compact matrix Lie groups should simplify things. I found some sources that suggest that existence of Haar measure is "trivial" to establish on Lie groups, but this requires familiarity with volume forms on manifolds, and I would prefer to even avoid this.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Question: "Is there a proof that does not require Haar measure or integration on manifolds?"

Answer: If your group $G$ is algebraic and semi-simple there is an elementary and algebraic proof in "Fulton/Harris - Representation theory a first course", Proposition C.15 using semi simple Lie algebras.

Hence if your Lie group is algebraic there is for every finite dimensional $G$-module $W$ a decomposition

$$W \cong W_1 \oplus \cdots \oplus W_k$$

where $W_i$ are irreducible $G$-modules.

When the book speaks about a "complementary $G$-module" $W'$ this means $V \cong W \oplus W'$. Hence by induction you get the above result.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simple_Lie_group#Compact

Note: The book of FU speaks of complex representations. It may be the proof in FU can be adapted to your situation: That every finite dimensional real representation $W$ of $G$ decompose into a direct sum of irreducible representations.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Here is the statement of the theorem you cited: "Let $V$ be a representation of the semisimple Lie algebra $\mathfrak g$ and $W \subset V$ a submodule. Then there exists a submodule $W' \subset V$ complementary to $W$. $\endgroup$ – WillG May 5 at 20:24
  • $\begingroup$ Could you explain how this implies the complete reducibility property for compact matrix Lie groups? $\endgroup$ – WillG May 5 at 20:24
  • $\begingroup$ @WillG: It would appear that the usual induction on the dimension works. Every nonzero module has an irreducible submodule; take one and find a complementary submodule, and if the latter is nonzero restrict to it and apply the induction hypothesis. $\endgroup$ – Marc van Leeuwen May 6 at 8:14

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.