1
$\begingroup$

In wikipedia page, a random process is a collection of random variables defined on a common probability space $(\Omega,\mathcal{F},P)$ , all take values in the same mathematical space S measurable with respect to $\sigma$-algebra $\Sigma$.

So to my understanding, that means we have a set with element $X:(\Omega,\mathcal{F},P)\rightarrow(S,\Sigma)$. I am quite confident with this part of my understanding. However, I don't quite get what does it mean that the collection of the random variable is indexed by some set $T$, all take values in the same mathematical space $S$.

I always understand the indexation as a kind of 1-1 function $I$, in this example, we have $I: T\rightarrow \mathcal{X}$ where $\mathcal{X}$ is the collection of all $X$

Up to this point, if I were to write the mathematical expression of a stochastic process, I will write: $$\mathcal{X}=\{X_i:i\in T\}$$

However, I am very confused with the difference between a random vector and a stochastic process, in a random vector, we have a series of $X_i,i\in1,2,...,n$ and we will define $X=(X_1,X_2,X_3,...,X_n)$ as a random vector. I know they are definitely not the same thing but I cannot really tell what makes them different. In some textbook, they give notation for stochastic process $X(\omega,t)$ which seems to tell the difference. This means $X$ is not only a function of $\omega$ but also a function of $t$. However, I don't know how to incorporate this way of explanation into my pre-established understanding of a random variable, which as I have explained, is $X:(\Omega,\mathcal{F},P)\rightarrow(S,\Sigma)$.

Sorry if you find my question silly. I have very limited exposure to rigorous mathematics but I'd like to be introduced to all necessary concepts to understand this term. Thank you so much!

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Suppose, a Random Experiment(say tossing a coin) is repeated infinitely many times. And each time/ each trial we are interested in observing the outcome as head(1) and tail(0) . If this outcome is denoted by $X_i$ for the i-th trial then the sequence $X_1,X_2,\dots,$ will be a stochastic process. The beauty of the topic is such that if we now define $$Y_n=f(X_1,\dots,X_n)$$ then $Y_n$ will also form a sequence of random variables which should be Stochastic Process. $\endgroup$
    – FAM
    Apr 28 '21 at 20:45
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ You can definitely view a random vector in $\mathbb{R}^n$ as a stochastic process indexed by $\{1,2,\ldots, n\}$. Vice versa, a stochastic process indexed by $\mathbb{N}$ is an infinite dimensional random vector. $\endgroup$
    – d.k.o.
    Apr 28 '21 at 20:52
  • $\begingroup$ And to add a remark. The index set doesn't need to be countable. In the generic setting of continuous-time stochastic processes your index set will rather be $[0,T]$ or $[0,\infty)$. $\endgroup$
    – Tobsn
    Apr 28 '21 at 20:55
  • $\begingroup$ random vectors and random processes are things completely different, the first is a vector-valued random variable and the second an indexed collection of random variables (vector-valued or whatever) $\endgroup$
    – Masacroso
    Apr 28 '21 at 23:06
0
$\begingroup$

In the general case, the index set $T$ needs not be countable. For instance, a stochastic process $X(\omega, t)$ with $t \in T = [0, 1]$ could not be expressed as a random vector.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ realizations of $X(\omega,t)$ could be for example in $L^2([0,1])$ though? $\endgroup$
    – Snoop
    Apr 29 '21 at 11:37
  • $\begingroup$ See here for example. $\endgroup$
    – Snoop
    Apr 29 '21 at 11:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.