9
$\begingroup$

I am reading this paper also here where in the Theorem 2.1 term topological divisor of zero has been used. I have gone through wiki articles where it has been mentioned that

An element $z$ of a Banach algebra $A$ is called a topological divisor of zero if there exists a sequence $x_1$, $x_2$, $x_3$, ... of elements of $A$ such that the sequence $zx_n$ converges to the zero element, but the sequence $x_n$ does not converge to the zero element.

However, I am not able to apply this definition in the paper mentioned above. Is there any other definitions of topological divisor of zero? Please explain me about this term so that I can understand why author of the paper has used this term?

Please help and thanks for all.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Is their an example of a topological zero divisor that is not a zero divisor? $\endgroup$ – Baby Dragon Jun 5 '13 at 12:12
4
+25
$\begingroup$

If your Banach algebra $A$ is the algebra $\mathcal L(E)$ of all bounded linear operators on some Banach space $E$, then one can use the following characterization: an operator $T\in\mathcal L(E)$ is $not$ a right topological divisor of $0$ if and only if $T$ is one-to-one with closed range; equivalently, if there is a constant $c>0$ such that $\Vert Tx\Vert\geq c\Vert x\Vert$ for all $x\in E$.

I don't know if this helps!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I wanted help in the context of the paper given in the link. $\endgroup$ – mathscrazy Jun 13 '13 at 3:56
  • $\begingroup$ I think there is a misleading statement in Theorem 2.1. What the author wanted to say (I hope) is that an operator $T$ is not a right topological divisor of $0$ if and only if the $adjoint\; operator$ $T'$ is onto. $\endgroup$ – Etienne Jun 13 '13 at 7:06

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.