The main theorem of Galois theory (in the finite case, for convenience) says that
Theorem 1: Let $L/k$ be a finite Galois extension with Galois group $G$. The maps $$M\mapsto \operatorname{Aut}(L|M)\qquad\text{and}\qquad H\mapsto L^H$$ yield an inclusion-reversing bijection between subfields $k\subset M\subset L$ and subgroups $H\subset G$.
This result can be generalized into an equivalence of categories which is known as Grothendieck's Galois theory:
Theorem 2: Let $k$ be a field and fix a separable closure $k_s$. The functor mapping a finite étale $k$-algebra $A$ to the finite set $\hom_k(A,k_s)$ gives an anti-equivalence between the category of finite étale $k$-algebras and the category of finite sets with continuous left $\operatorname{Gal}(k)$-action.
Now, the main theorem of Kummer theory is very similar in style to our Theorem 1. For that, we will say that a finite Galois extension $L/k$ is $n$-Kummer if $k$ contains a primitive $n$-th root of unity and if $\operatorname{Gal}(L/k)$ is abelian of exponent dividing $n$.
Theorem 3: Let $n\geq 1$, $k$ be a field and fix and algebraic closure $\bar{k}$. The maps $$M\mapsto k^\times \cap M^{\times n}/k^{\times n}\qquad\text{and}\qquad A\to k[\sqrt[n]{a}:[a]\in A]$$ yield an inclusion-preserving bijection between the $n$-Kummer extensions $M/k$ contained in $\bar{k}$ and the finite subgroups $A$ os $k^\times/k^{\times n}$.
I wonder if we can write our theorem 3 as an equivalence of categories similar to the one in theorem 2.