4
$\begingroup$

Let $G_i\to P_i\to M$ be principal fiber bundles with representations $\rho_i\colon G_i\to\mathrm{GL}(V_i)$ and associated vector bundles $E_i\to M$. Given local sections $s_i\colon U\to P_i$, I expect that a bijection \begin{equation} C^\infty(U,V_1\otimes\cdots\otimes V_n)\to\Gamma(U,E_1\otimes\cdots\otimes E_n) \end{equation} can be constructed.

Here's my guess:

For all $m\in U\subset M$, \begin{align} V_i&\to (E_i)_m\\ v&\mapsto[s_i(m),v] \end{align} is a bijection$^1$ and we define \begin{equation} \Phi_m\colon V_1\otimes\cdots\otimes V_n\to(E_1)_m\otimes\cdots\otimes(E_n)_m \end{equation} to be the unique isomorphism s.t. $\Phi_m(v_1\otimes\cdots\otimes v_n)=[s_1(m),v_1]\otimes\cdots\otimes[s_n(m),v_n]$.

The isomorphism \begin{equation} \Phi\colon C^\infty(U,V_1\otimes\cdots\otimes V_n)\to\Gamma(U,E_1\otimes\cdots\otimes E_n) \end{equation} is then defined by \begin{equation} (\Phi(f))(m)=(\Phi_m\circ f)(m). \end{equation}


$^1$This follows from the definition of the equivalence classes and the fact that $G\ni g\to pg\in P$ is a bijection for all $p\in M$ (according to the definition of principal fiber bundles).

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ What exactly is the question? Your $\Phi$ seems to me like a good guess... $\endgroup$ – nicrot000 Jun 7 at 15:21
  • $\begingroup$ @nicrot000 Since it was only a guess, I wished to have a confirmation. $\endgroup$ – Filippo Jun 7 at 19:26
1
$\begingroup$

So, since you asked in the comments above, here is your confirmation.

Maybe I can add, that since you have sections $s_i$ on $U$ in each of your principal bundles, they are all trivializable over that same $U$, consequently each of the associated vector bundles is trivializable over this $U$.

On the other hand, $C^\infty(U,V_1\otimes\cdots\otimes V_n)$ is a section space over $U$ in the trivial bundle $U\times(V_1\otimes\cdots\otimes V_n)$ and applying the inverse of the respective trivialization to each factor should simply give you the isomorphism $$ C^\infty(U,V_1\otimes\cdots\otimes V_n)\to\Gamma(U,E_1\otimes\cdots\otimes E_n). $$ The (inverse) trivilization in each factor is then, as you remarked in the footnote, given by $v\mapsto[s_i(m),v]$.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Please let me know if I understand your answer correctly: Consider a vector bundle $\pi\colon E\to M$ with general fiber $V$ and a bundle atlas $A$. Each bundle chart $\phi\colon\pi^{-1}(U)\to U\times V$ in $A$ is bijective and therefore defines a bijection $\Gamma(U,E)\to\Gamma(U,M\times V)$. Since $\Gamma(U,M\times V)$ is isomorphic to the set of functions from $U$ to $V$, a bundle chart allows us to identify local sections with vector valued functions. My question is about the special case where $E$ is the tensor product bundle of associated vector bundles. $\endgroup$ – Filippo Jun 8 at 14:31
  • $\begingroup$ It doesn't matter if $V$ is just a generic space, or if $V$ is assumed to be a space of the shape $V=V_1\otimes...\otimes V_n$ with some other spaces $V_1,\dots,V_n$. I think I can't point out where exactly your confusion lies in. $\endgroup$ – nicrot000 Jun 8 at 17:42
  • $\begingroup$ For the first part, yes this is correct, up to the detail that the bijectivity of $\phi$ alone is not enough, you really need that $\phi$ is an isomorphism of the bundles $\pi^{-1}(U)$ and $U\times V$. $\endgroup$ – nicrot000 Jun 8 at 17:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.