I was reading chapter 5 of Dynamical Processes on Complex Networks, which discusses the Ising model, where I encountered the following equation for the average magnetization of the class of nodes with degree k: $$\langle \sigma \rangle_k = \frac{1}{N_k}\sum_{i/k_i = k} \langle \sigma_i \rangle$$

I'm particularly confused by the notation $$\sum_{i/k_i = k}$$

Can anyone explain what this means?


$$\sum\limits_{i\mid k_i=k} a_i,$$ also written $$\sum\limits_{i: k_i=k} a_i,$$ means to sum $a_i$ over indices $i$ such that $k_i=k$.

To make it clearer that the formula is an average, I probably would have first defined $N_k = \{i \in N: k_i = k\}$ as the set of nodes with degree $k$ and then used the expression $$\langle \sigma \rangle_k = \frac{1}{|N_k|}\sum_{i\in N_k} \langle \sigma_i \rangle$$

  • $\begingroup$ / and | are equivalent notations in this case, then? $\endgroup$ – EJoshuaS - Reinstate Monica Apr 13 at 2:18
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, but $\mid$ and $:$ are more common. $\endgroup$ – RobPratt Apr 13 at 2:19
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, that makes a lot of sense in this context. I'll accept the answer as soon as the system allows me to. $\endgroup$ – EJoshuaS - Reinstate Monica Apr 13 at 2:20
  • $\begingroup$ If $i/k_i=k$ for integers, then it seems that $k\mid i$, rather than $i\mid k$. Does dynamical systems really standardly reverse things/misuse $/$ in this way? $\endgroup$ – Mark S. Apr 13 at 10:47
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @MarkS. there is no division here. The $/$ or $\mid$ indicates such that here. Better notation would have been $i\in N: k_i=k$. $\endgroup$ – RobPratt Apr 13 at 12:48

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.