1
$\begingroup$

I have multiple ways of showing that the lines of action of 3 co-planar forces in static equilibrium meet at a point. But they combine physical arguments and math. It seems like there should be some purely mathematical way of proving the claim, treating it as a system of equations having a unique solution.

Is there a way to express this as a uniquely determined system of linear equations?

Here are the equations of equilibrium corresponding to the illustration, where $\vec{r}_1=\mathfrak{p}_1-\mathscr{O},$ etc. The heavy gray line is a rigid rod in equilibrium under the applied forces.

$$\begin{aligned} \vec{0}&=\vec{f}_{1}+\vec{f}_{2}+\vec{f}_{3}\\ \vec{0}&=\vec{r}_{1}\times\vec{f}_{1}+\vec{r}_{2}\times\vec{f}_{2}+\vec{r}_{3}\times\vec{f}_{3}\\ \vec{0}&=\left(\vec{r}_{1}-\vec{p}\right)\times\vec{f}_{1}+\left(\vec{r}_{2}-\vec{p}\right)\times\vec{f}_{2}+\left(\vec{r}_{3}-\vec{p}\right)\times\vec{f}_{3} \end{aligned}$$

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

The equation of a line through $r_i$ in the direction $f_i$ is $(r-r_i)\times f_i=0$ which we can rewrite as $r\times f_i=r_i\times f_i$. Now assuming $f_1$ and $f_2$ are not parallel, they intersect at some point $p$, so $$p\times f_1=r_1\times f_1$$ and $$p\times f_2=r_2\times f_2$$ which gives that

$$p\times(f_1+f_2)=r_1\times f_1+r_2\times f_2.$$ Now add $p\times f_3$ to both sides, to give $$0=r_1\times f_1+r_2\times f_2+p\times f_3$$ by the fact that the forces are in equilibrium (your first equation). But using the fact that the moments are in equilibrium (your second equation) gives that $$r_1\times f_1+r_2\times f_2+r_3\times f_3=r_1\times f_1+r_2\times f_2+p\times f_3$$ so $$r_3\times f_3=p\times f_3$$ which exactly says that $p$ (the intersection of the first two lines) also lies on the third line, thus the lines all intersect at a common point.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ When I asked a physicist about the case of parallel forces, he used the assumption of projective geometry that parallel lines meet at a point at infinity. $\endgroup$ – Steven Thomas Hatton Apr 8 at 14:27
  • $\begingroup$ @StevenThomasHatton Yes, if you allow the point at infinity, then your claim is also true in the cases with two or three of the forces being parallel. $\endgroup$ – acernine Apr 8 at 14:45
  • $\begingroup$ A moment's reflection will convince you that if any two of the forces are parallel, all three must be. $\endgroup$ – Steven Thomas Hatton Apr 8 at 15:18
  • $\begingroup$ The hook I was missing was the equation of a line in the form $(r-r_i)\times f_i=0$. I'm certain I've encountered it before, but its practical utility was lost on me until now. $\endgroup$ – Steven Thomas Hatton Apr 8 at 17:48

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.