0
$\begingroup$

We've got the usual filtered stochastic basis $(\Omega, \mathcal F, (\mathcal F_n). \mathbb P), \space \tau : \Omega \to \mathbb{N}\cup \{\infty\}, [\tau \le n] \in \mathcal F_n$

($\tau$ is an $\mathcal F_n$ stopping time).

I'm wondering whether the implication below holds:

$$\tau \in L^1 ( \mathbb P) \Rightarrow \mathbb P [\tau < \infty]=1$$

I think it should hold, because

$$\tau \in L^1 ( \mathbb P) \Rightarrow \mathbb E [\tau] =\int_{\Omega}\tau d \mathbb P < \infty \\ \mathbb P [\tau < \infty] = \int_{[\tau < \infty]} d \mathbb P \le \int_{\Omega} d \mathbb P \le \int_{\Omega}\tau d \mathbb P < \infty $$

The only problem I can see is that $$\int_{\Omega} d \mathbb P \le \int_{\Omega}\tau d \mathbb P $$ might not hold in general. For instance if $X \sim N(0,\sigma^2)$ we've got $\mathbb P (\Omega) =1$ and $\mathbb{E} X =0$. So is this the reason why my proof does not work?

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You've identified one problem with your reasoning, but even if that inequality were true I don't see how it would prove that $\tau$ is finite with probability one. $\endgroup$
    – Gibarian
    Jun 1 '13 at 10:08
3
$\begingroup$

The implication holds for any random variable, not just stopping times. It easily seen by showing the contrapositive: $$ P(X<\infty)<1\;\Rightarrow\;X\notin L^1(P). $$ So suppose $P(X<\infty)<1$, then $P(X=\infty)>0$ and hence $$ {\rm E}[|X|]\geq{\rm E}[|X|\mathbf{1}_{\{X=\infty\}}]=\infty\cdot P(X=\infty)=\infty, $$ and hence $X\notin L^1(P)$. The other implication, however, does not hold in general.

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ not sure if I understand what you mean. I elaborated on my reasoning (see above) $\endgroup$
    – shimee
    Jun 1 '13 at 9:29
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @shimee: What is it you don't understand? $\endgroup$ Jun 1 '13 at 9:31
  • $\begingroup$ your proof. You're proving it by contradiction? Also, what do you mean by "The other implication, however, does not hold in general."? Have a look on my proof in the original question. Is it correct? $\endgroup$
    – shimee
    Jun 1 '13 at 9:37
  • $\begingroup$ In general, instead of showing that A implies B you can show that not-A implies not-B. See this. What I mean by "the other implication does not hold" is that you can't say $P(X<\infty)=1\;\Rightarrow\; X\in L^1(P)$. I don't get the first line of your proof. $\endgroup$ Jun 1 '13 at 9:41
  • $\begingroup$ the probability measure of tau being less than infinity is equal to the measure of the entire space. I switched it around (just now) for better clarity. $\endgroup$
    – shimee
    Jun 1 '13 at 9:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.