2
$\begingroup$

I am doing the following exercise in Lee's "Introduction to Smooth Manifolds."

Exercise 12.18. Show that $T^kT^*M$, $T^kTM$, and $T^{(k,l)}TM$ have natural structures as smooth vector bundles over $M$, and determine their ranks.

I am trying to use the following two theorems.

Lemma 10.6 (Vector Bundle Chart Lemma). Let $M$ be a smooth manifold with or without boundary, and suppose that for each $p\in M$ we are given a real vector space $E_p$ of some fixed dimension $k$. Let $E=\bigsqcup_{p\in M}E_p$, and let $\pi:E\to M$ be the map that takes each element of $E_p$ to the point $p$. Suppose furthermore that we are given the following data:
(i) an open cover $\{U_\alpha\}_{\alpha\in A}$ of $M$
(ii) for each $\alpha\in A$, a bijective map $\phi_\alpha:\pi^{-1}(U_\alpha)\to U_\alpha\times\mathbb R^k$ whose restriction to each $E_p$ is a vector space isomorphism from $E_p$ to $\{p\}\times\mathbb R^k\cong\mathbb R^k$
(iii) for each $\alpha,\beta\in A$ with $U_\alpha\cap U_\beta\ne\emptyset$, a smooth map $\tau_{\alpha\beta}:U_\alpha\cap U_\beta\to\operatorname{GL}(k,\mathbb R)$ (which will be called a transition function) such that the map $\phi_\alpha\circ\phi_\beta^{-1}$ from $(U_\alpha\cap U_\beta)\times\mathbb R^k$ to itself has the form \begin{equation} \phi_\alpha\circ\phi_\beta^{-1}(p,v)=(p,\tau_{\alpha\beta}(p)v) \end{equation} Then $E$ has a unique topology and smooth structure making it into a smooth manifold with or without boundary and a smooth rank-$k$ vector bundle over $M$, with $\pi$ as projection and $\{(U_\alpha,\phi_\alpha)\}$ as smooth local trivializations.

A Generalization of Proposition 12.10 (Abstract vs. Concrete Tensor Products). Let $F$ be a field. Let $k,l\in\mathbb N=\{0,1,2,\ldots\}$. If $V_1,\ldots,V_k,V_{k+1},\ldots,V_{k+l}$ are finite-dimensional vector spaces over $F$, then there is a unique linear map \begin{equation} f:V_1\otimes\cdots\otimes V_k\otimes V_{k+1}^*\otimes\cdots\otimes V_{k+l}^* \to L(V_1^*,\ldots,V_k^*,V_{k+1},\ldots,V_{k+l};F) \end{equation} such that \begin{equation} f(v_1\otimes\cdots\otimes v_k\otimes\omega^{k+1}\otimes\cdots\otimes\omega^{k+l}) = v_1^{**}\otimes\cdots\otimes v_k^{**}\otimes\omega^{k+1}\otimes\cdots\otimes\omega^{k+l}\text{.} \end{equation} Furthermore, $f$ is a vector space isomorphism.

Here, $v^{**}$ is the image of $v\in V$ with respect to the natural map $V\to V^{**}$.

I want to use the vector bundle chart lemma to give $T^{(k,l)}TM$ a vector bundle structure over $M$. For each smooth chart $(U_\alpha,\phi_\alpha)$ for $M$, define $\phi_\alpha:\pi^{-1}(U_\alpha)\to U_\alpha\times\mathbb R^{n^{k+l}}$ by \begin{equation} \phi_\alpha(\alpha^{i_1\cdots i_k}_{i_{k+1}\cdots i_{k+l}} \frac{\partial}{\partial x^{i_1}}\Bigr|_p\otimes\cdots\otimes\frac{\partial}{\partial x^{i_k}}\Bigr|_p \otimes dx^{i_{k+1}}|_p\otimes\cdots\otimes dx^{i_{k+l}}|_p) = (p,(\alpha^{i_1\cdots i_k}_{i_{k+1}\cdots i_{k+l}}))\text{.} \end{equation} Let $(U_\alpha,x^1,\ldots,x^n)$ and $(U_\beta,y^1,\ldots,y^n)$ be two smooth charts for $M$. Now I have to show that there is a transition function $\tau$ for $\phi_\alpha\circ\phi_\beta^{-1}$. Let $p\in U_\alpha\cap U_\beta$. Then with some calculations using Proposition 12.10, I found that $\tau(p)$ should be the $n^{k+l}\times n^{k+l}$ matrix \begin{equation} \left(\frac{\partial y^{j_1}}{\partial x^{i_1}}(p)\cdots\frac{\partial y^{j_k}}{\partial x^{i_k}}(p) \frac{\partial x^{i_{k+1}}}{\partial y^{j_{k+1}}}(p)\cdots\frac{\partial x^{i_{k+l}}}{\partial y^{j_{k+l}}}(p)\right) \end{equation} (The above entry runs over all indices $i_1,\ldots,i_{k+l}$ as it goes down from top to bottom row, and $j_1,\ldots,j_{k+l}$ as it goes from left to right column). But the hypothesis of the vector bundle chart lemma requires that $\tau(p)$ should be invertible, but I do not know why this is invertible.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Isn't it a requirement a priori that $\tau_{\alpha \beta}^{-1}\tau_{\alpha \beta}$ is an isomorphism?$ $\endgroup$ – SoboKevSpace Mar 25 at 8:37
  • $\begingroup$ @Kevin If the vector bundle is already constructed, then $\tau(p)$ will be invertible for all transition function $\tau$. But I am trying to construct a vector bundle, so I don't think it's guaranteed that $\tau(p)$ is invertible. $\endgroup$ – zxcv Mar 25 at 8:57
3
$\begingroup$

I think you are missing the point of Lemma 10.6. Let $p \in U_\alpha \cap U_\beta$. from (ii) it is given that $$\phi_\alpha\circ \phi_\beta ^{-1}|_{\{p\} \times \mathbb R^k}: \{p\} \times \mathbb R^k \to \{p\} \times \mathbb R^k$$ is a vector space isomorphism. Thus $$\phi_\alpha\circ \phi_\beta ^{-1}(p, v) = (p, \tau _{\alpha\beta} (p) v)$$ for some $\tau_{\alpha\beta}(p) \in GL(k,\mathbb R)$. The main assumption in (iii) is that the map $\tau_{\alpha \beta }: U_\alpha \cap U_\beta \to GL(k,\mathbb R)$ is smooth. (Say, if $\tau_{\alpha\beta}$ is merely continuous, you get only a continuous vector bundle).

Thus to use Lemma 10.6 it is sufficient to construct $\phi_\alpha$ which satisfies (ii) and checks the smoothness of $\tau_{\alpha\beta}$, which should be obvious in this case.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.