0
$\begingroup$

In ahlfors text it states that(formally)

If the rules of calculus were applicable, we would obtain $$\frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{z}}=\frac12\left(\frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{x}}-i\frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{y}}\right), \frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{\overline{z}}}=\frac12\left(\frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{x}}+i\frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{y}}\right)$$

And we see that $f$ being analytic,

$$\frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{x}} = -i\frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{y}}$$ holds, which gives that, $$\frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{\overline{z}}}=0$$

Now , in text following he states that,

the conjugate function $\overline{f(z)}$ has derivative $0$ w.r.t $z$.

That is , $$\frac{\partial{\overline{f}}}{\partial{z}}=0$$

I didn't get this.

Won't this mean , $\frac{\partial{\overline{f}}}{\partial{z}}=\frac12\left(\frac{\partial{\overline{f}}}{\partial{x}}-i\frac{\partial{\overline{f}}}{\partial{y}}\right)$ , and from $\frac{\partial{\overline{f}}}{\partial{x}} = -i\frac{\partial{\overline{f}}}{\partial{y}}$

I didn't see how it's coming, i suppose their a mistake of mine considering $\frac{\partial{\overline{f}}}{\partial{z}} = \overline {\frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{z}}}$

Please explain, where's the mistake , and what does actually is the difference between differentiating a analytic function and its conjugate.

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ The conjugate function is not analytic, so by the chain rule it breaks analycity. $\endgroup$
    – user65203
    Mar 19 at 17:06
  • $\begingroup$ $\frac{\partial{\overline{f}}}{\partial{z}} = \overline {({\frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{\bar z}}})}=0$ (just check definitions of the partials in $z, \bar z$ with $f=u+iv, \bar f=u-iv$) $\endgroup$
    – Conrad
    Mar 19 at 17:15
  • $\begingroup$ @YvesDaoust , if it's not analytic, then, what does applying chain rule means, sorry for my ignorance, please explain a bit more. $\endgroup$
    – Rkb
    Mar 20 at 3:44
  • $\begingroup$ @Conrad i understand the definition of partials in $z$ but please could you restate or provide a source, about the same, thing in $\overline{z}$ $\endgroup$
    – Rkb
    Mar 20 at 3:46
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ with the motivation as noted above, we define $\frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{\overline{z}}}=\frac12\left(\frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{x}}+i\frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{y}}\right)$; from here it is straightforward that $\frac{\partial{\overline{f}}}{\partial{z}} = \overline {({\frac{\partial{f}}{\partial{\bar z}}})}$ $\endgroup$
    – Conrad
    Mar 20 at 13:55
0
$\begingroup$

The conjugate function is analytic as a function of $\overline{z}.$ So, letting $u =\overline{z},$ the computation you give implies that $\frac{\partial \overline{f}}{\partial \overline{u}} = 0.$ But $\overline{u} = z,$ so what your professor says is true.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks i understand, and does the equations, $\frac{\partial{\overline{f}}}{\partial{z}}=\frac12\left(\frac{\partial{\overline{f}}}{\partial{x}}-i\frac{\partial{\overline{f}}}{\partial{y}}\right)$ and $\frac{\partial{\overline{f}}}{\partial{x}} = -i\frac{\partial{\overline{f}}}{\partial{y}}$ holds? Please explain a bit. $\endgroup$
    – Rkb
    Mar 20 at 3:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.