1
$\begingroup$

My question is about the well-definedness of zeros and poles of rational functions following Vakil's Rising Sea (November 18, 2017 Edition).

On a regular codimension $1$ point $p$, we define the number of zeros resp. poles of an element $f \in \operatorname{Quot}(\mathcal{O}_{X,p})$ via the discrete valuation given by the DVR $\mathcal{O}_{X,p}$ (p. 353). In algebraic geometry, one then usually considers some rational function $s$ and tries to analyze the number of zeros and poles of $s$. I'm confused in how this makes sense, i.e. why is $s$ naturally an element in $\mathcal{O}_{X,p}$?

Let me also recall quickly the definition of rational functions in Vakil's book. On p. 171 we define a rational function on a scheme $X$ as an equivalence class of pairs $(U, s \in \Gamma(U, \mathcal{O}_X))$ where $\operatorname{Ass}(X) \subseteq U$. Two pairs $(U,s)$ and $(U',s')$ are said to be equivalent if $s|_{U \cap U'} = s'|_{U \cap U'}$. I'm guessing that my confusion stems from an insufficient understanding of associated points.


So to summarize: Given a rational function $s \in \Gamma(U,\mathcal{O}_X)$ with $\operatorname{Ass}(X) \subseteq U$, why is $s$ naturally an element of $\operatorname{Quot}(\mathcal{O}_{X,p})$ for all regular codimension $1$ points $p$?

$\endgroup$
2
+50
$\begingroup$

If $p\in X$ is a regular codimension one point, then it is in the closure of exactly one associated point $\eta$ of $X$ (ref), and in fact that point is the generic point of the unique irreducible component it is on. As the reduced locus is open in a noetherian scheme (ref), we can pick an integral affine open neighborhood $\operatorname{Spec} A\subset X$ of $p$. Then $\mathcal{O}_{X,p}$ is a localization of $A$, and $\mathcal{O}_{X,\eta}$ is the quotient field of $A$, so $\operatorname{Frac}(\mathcal{O}_{X,p})=\mathcal{O}_{X,\eta}$.

Now suppose $U\subset X$ contains all the associated points of $X$. Let $p\in X$ be a regular codimension one point and $\eta$ the unique associated point of $X$ which is a generalization of $p$. Then $s\in\mathcal{O}_X(U)$ maps to $\mathcal{O}_{X,\eta}$ by restriction, and as $\mathcal{O}_{X,\eta}=\operatorname{Frac}(\mathcal{O}_{X,p})$ we've explained what you were interested in.


Let me note a couple of small imprecisions in your question, just in case these were contributing to some of your troubles.

... I'm confused in how this makes sense, i.e. why is $s$ naturally an element in $\mathcal{O}_{X,p}$?

You stated this incorrectly here, but correctly after the line break: $s$ is naturally an element of $\operatorname{Frac}(\mathcal{O}_{X,p})$, not $\mathcal{O}_{X,p}$.

... Given a rational function $s \in \Gamma(U,\mathcal{O}_X)$ ...

It would be more precise to say "a rational function represented by $s\in\Gamma(U,\mathcal{O}_X)$".

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Excellent answer. $\endgroup$
    – Qi Zhu
    Mar 23 '21 at 13:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.