Newton's root finding method that copes with stationary points I am using Newton's method to solve an equation of the form $y=f(x)$ for increasing values of $y$. The value of $x$ found for some $y$ is used for the next $y$ as a starting approximation and this works fine.
$f$ is increasing but may have stationary points, and I do have situations where the range of interest of $y$ starts or ends on an extremum or very close. This causes the algorithm to experience a division by zero or yield very inaccurate roots.
Is there a simple way to cope ? Is there a known modified Newton's method able to deal with this situation ?
I know that double roots can be handled by the modified iterations $$x\leftarrow x-2\frac{f(x)}{f'(x)}$$ but this still does not work at the root, and one needs to know when to activate the factor $2$.

For information, my function $f$ is a cubic polynomial, but I want to avoid the explicit computation of the roots by Cardano's formulas.

Update:
If we restate Newton's method at a stationary point, we get to the next term of Taylor's development,
$$f(x+h)-y\approx f(x)-y+\frac{h^2}2f''(x),$$
so that $$h\approx\sqrt{-\frac{f(x)-y}{f''(x)}}.$$
In fact, the approximation
$$f(x+h)-y\approx f(x)-y+h f'(x)+\frac{h^2}2f''(x)$$ always holds, giving the general formula
$$h\approx \frac{f'(x)\pm\sqrt{f'^2(x)-2f''(x)(f(x)-y)}}{f''(x)}.$$
Due to the increased complexity, I don't want to use that formula all the time.
 A: There is an easy modification called modified Newton's method. The idea is easy: every time the derivative is zero, one uses a value of the derivative from the last iteration, when it was nonzero (couple of times if needed). This changes the method to the secant kind of method for these couple of iterations. When it becomes nonzero again, one switches back to Newton's method. In more dimensions it works as well.
Additional thing, which you can always try in case of convergence problems, is the damped version of Newton's method. It means, that you reduce each increment by some fixed value smaller than $1$, for example by $0.9$.
Can you post the function you solve and your starting point?
A: If I understood correctly, the basic step is to solve the equation $f(x)-y=0$, for given $y$. If we are unsure of the multiplicity of a root, we can apply the modified Newton's method, which corresponds to the application of the usual Newton's method to $g(x)=\frac{f(x)-y}{f'(x)}$. This way, the quadratic convergence is recovered, at least in exact arithmetic. The iteration would be
$$
x_{n+1} = x_n-\dfrac{\frac{f(x_n)-y}{f'(x_n)}}{\frac{f'(x_n)^2 - (f(x_n)-y)f''(x_n)}{f'(x_n)^2} } = x_n - \dfrac{f'(x_n)(f(x_n)-y)}{f'(x_n)^2-f''(x_n)(f(x_n)-y)}
$$
If, by any chance, $f'(x_0)=0$, just move it  a bit.
A: Momentum-based algorithms are good at passing through stationary points while retaining fast convergence.
$$m_i=(1-\beta)f'(x_i)+\beta m_{i-1}=m_{i-1}-(1-\beta)(m_{i-1}-f'(x_i))$$
$$x_{i+1}=x_i-(1-\beta^i)\frac{f(x_i)}{m_i}$$
The $1-\beta^i$ factor serves as bias correction, supposing one takes $m_0=0$, since we get $m_i=(1-\beta^i)f'(x_i)$ if $x_i$ is fixed.
As $\beta\to0$, you get Newton's method and faster convergence, while for larger $\beta$ you will get better "resilience" against stationary points.
For your purposes, you know that $f'(x)\ge0$, so rather than setting $m_0=0$, you may want to initialize it to a small positive value, or perhaps even use the same $m_i$ sequence for every $y$, since it is likely you will converge to the solution for $y=f(x)$ for a given $y$ while $m_i$ is sufficiently large that starting from where it left off works well for the next $y$.
If you go with the latter approach, you'll want to choose $\beta$ based on the density of your $y$ around the stationary points. If $\beta$ is too small and you have many $y$ near a stationary point, then $m_i$ will decay rapidly, which leaves you with the original issue.
