The dual space to the Banach space $L^1(\mu)$ for a sigma-finite measure $\mu$ is $L^\infty(\mu)$, given by the correspondence

$\phi \in L^\infty(\mu) \mapsto I_\phi$, where $I_\phi(f) = \int f \cdot \phi \,d\mu$ for $f \in L^1(\mu)$.

Now, we consider this for more general measures $\mu$. If $\mu$ is not semifinite, then there is a measurable subset $A$ with $\mu(A) = \infty$ but $\mu(B) = 0$ for every subset $B$ of $A$ with $\mu(B) < \infty$. Any $\phi$ supported on $A$ will then map to the zero functional, so the correspondence is not one-to-one.

If $\mu$ is semifinite, the correspondence is one-to-one, but is it onto?

Using the Radon-Nikodym Thorem, any member of $L^1(B)^*$ for $\mu(B) < \infty$ can be represented by an $L^\infty(B)$ function class $[\phi_B]$. Unlike in the $\sigma$-finite measure case, however, I do not see an easy way to form a "patchwork" $\phi$ with $\phi|_B = \phi_B$ a.e.$[\mu]$. I suspect this may have an easy answer, but it eludes me. Or perhaps there is a well-known counterexample?


To answer the question in the title, there is the following general theorem:

The natural map $I \colon L^\infty(X) \to (L^1(X))^\ast$ is

  1. an isometric injection if and only if $(X,\Sigma,\mu)$ is semifinite.
  2. an isometric isomorphism if and only if $(X,\Sigma,\mu)$ is localizable.

You already covered point 1 in your question (the isometry property being straightforward). The second point is more delicate.

A measure space $(X,\Sigma,\mu)$ is called localizable if it is semifinite and in addition the following condition holds:

For every family $\mathcal{F} \subseteq \Sigma$ there is $H \in \Sigma$ such that

  1. $F \setminus H$ is a null set for all $F \in \mathcal{F}$.
  2. If $G \in \Sigma$ is such that $F \setminus G$ is a null set for all $F \in \mathcal{F}$ then $H \setminus G$ is a null set.

Loosely speaking, this property asserts that every family $\mathcal{F}$ of measurable sets has a smallest measurable envelope $H$ (up to null sets).

The definition of localizability implies via a slightly technical argument that one can glue together measurable functions. More precisely:

Let $\mathscr{F}$ be a family of functions such that each $f \in \mathscr{F}$ is defined and measurable on a measurable subset $D_f$ of the localizable measure space $(X,\Sigma,\mu)$. Suppose in addition that $f_1 = f_2$ a.e. on $D_{f_1} \cap D_{f_2}$ whenever $f_1,f_2 \in \mathscr{F}$. Then there is a measurable function $g \colon X \to \mathbb{R}$ whose restriction to $D_f$ satisfies $g|_{D_f} = f$ a.e. for all $f \in \mathscr{F}$.

Using this result one can patch together the Radon-Nikodym derivatives one obtains from restricting a continuous linear functional $\varphi \colon L^1(X) \to \mathbb{R}$ to the subspaces $L^1(F) \subseteq L^1(X)$ where $F$ runs through the subsets of finite measure of $X$.

The proof of the converse direction proceeds by a direct verification of the localizability property of $(X,\Sigma,\mu)$ the fact that $I$ is isometric implies semi-finiteness by point 1. of the theorem and the "envelope condition" uses surjectivity of $I$.

Details can be found in 243G on page 153 of this PDF. The gluing property is proved in 213N on page 28.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thanks! I had not previously heard of localizability as a property of measure spaces, and that gluing result is exactly the kind of property needed. $\endgroup$
    – Ben Passer
    May 29 '13 at 16:42

Let $X$ be an uncountable set, equipped with the $\sigma$-algebra $\mathcal{F}$ consisting of all countable sets and their complements, or any other $\sigma$-algebra that contains all singletons but is not $2^X$. Let $\mu$ be counting measure, which is semifinite. Note that any function in $L^1(\mu)$ is supported on a countable set. Let $E$ be a subset of $X$ which is not in $\mathcal{F}$, and for $f \in L^1(\mu)$ set $I(f) = \sum_{x \in E} f(x)$. Clearly this is a continuous linear functional on $L^1(\mu)$ (with norm 1). However, if $I(f) = \int fg\,d\mu$ it's easy to see we would have to have $g = 1_E$, but this is not in $L^\infty(\mu)$ because $E$ is not measurable.

But $\sigma$-finiteness is not necessary, either: repeat this example with $\mathcal{F} = 2^X$.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks a bunch! I'm kicking myself for not thinking of this. I'd upvote it, but I don't have enough "reputation" yet. $\endgroup$
    – Ben Passer
    May 29 '13 at 5:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.