Consider the Ricci tensor given by $R_{\alpha \beta} = \nabla_\alpha \nabla_\beta \phi$ for scalar field $\phi$. I've been trying to use the Ricci and contracted Bianchi identities to show that $$\nabla_\alpha (\nabla_\beta \nabla^\beta \phi) = -2R_{\alpha \beta} \nabla^\beta \phi.$$

[In this case the Ricci identity is $\nabla_\alpha \nabla_\beta V^\gamma - \nabla_\beta \nabla_\alpha V^\gamma = R^\gamma_{\delta \alpha \beta} V^\delta$ and the contracted Bianchi identity is $\nabla^\beta R_{\alpha \beta} = \frac{1}{2}\nabla_\alpha R$.]

My 'attempt':
One can contract the definition with $g^{\alpha \beta}$ to get $R = \nabla_\beta \nabla^\beta \phi$, where $R$ is the Ricci scalar. Applying $\nabla_\alpha$ to both sides and using the contracted Bianchi identity, I got $$2 \nabla^\beta \nabla_\alpha \nabla_\beta \phi = \nabla_\alpha (\nabla_\beta \nabla^\beta \phi ),$$ which is perhaps a non-zero amount of progress. I also played around with the two identities separately but couldn't produce anything that seemed useful. Any help in getting started is greatly appreciated!



$$R_{\alpha \beta} = \nabla_\alpha \nabla_\beta \phi\tag{1}$$

Thus, applying $\nabla_\beta$ in the last equality and by Ricci identity and Bianchi identity, we have \begin{align*} \nabla_\beta R_\alpha^\beta&=\nabla_\beta(\nabla_\alpha\nabla_\beta\phi)\\ \frac{1}{2}\nabla_\alpha R&=\nabla_\alpha(\nabla_\beta\nabla^\beta\phi)+R^\beta_{\delta\beta\alpha}\nabla^\delta\phi.\tag{2} \end{align*} By other hand, tracing the equality (1), we obtain $$R=R_\beta^\beta=\nabla_\beta\nabla^\beta\phi.$$ Applying $\nabla_\alpha$ in the last equality, we obtain $$\nabla_\alpha R=\nabla_\alpha\nabla_\beta\nabla^\beta\phi\tag{3}$$

Putting, (3) in (2), we obtain \begin{align*} \frac{1}{2}\nabla_\alpha(\nabla_\beta\nabla^\beta\phi)&=\nabla_\alpha(\nabla_\beta\nabla^\beta\phi)+R_{\delta\alpha}\nabla^\delta\phi\\ -\frac{1}{2}\nabla_\alpha(\nabla_\beta\nabla^\beta\phi)&=R_{\delta\alpha}\nabla^\delta\phi\\ \nabla_\alpha(\nabla_\beta\nabla^\beta\phi)&=-2R_{\alpha\beta}\nabla^\beta\phi \end{align*}

In the last equality, we change $\delta$ by $\beta$ (since is a summand) and the fact that $Ric$ tensor is symmetric.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.