2
$\begingroup$

It is stated that the equation for the best $\hat{x}$ uses the covariance matrix $V$ such that $$ A^TV^{-1}A\hat{x}=A^TV^{-1}b $$ and the error vector is $\vec{e}=(b-Ax)^TV^{-1}(b-Ax)$ and we need to minimize $e=\sum_{i=1}^m\dfrac{(b-Ax)_i^2}{\sigma_i^2}$

How do I make sense of this idea of weighted least squares in comparison with ordinary least square method ?

And how does the inverse of variances become the respective weights ?

My Understanding

Least square


We have a system $Ax=b$ and $b$ need not have to be in the column space of $A$.

pic

We need the vector $A\hat{x}$ in $C(A)$ thats best fit to $b$, ie., closest to $b$.

So we need to minimize the error vector $\vec{e}=b-Ax$, ie., we need to minimize $e=e_1^2+\cdots+e_m^2=(b-Ax)^T(b-Ax)=||b-Ax||^2=\sum_{i=1}^m(b-Ax)_i^2$

Weighted Least square


I think here we are assigning weights for each errors such that each error is not equally likely, say $w_i$

Then we need to minimize the error $e=\sum_{i=1}^m w_ie_i=(b-Ax)^TW(b-Ax)=\sum_{i=1}^m w_i(b-Ax)_i^2$.

But how does the matrix for the weights $W$ is the inverse of the covariance matrix $V^{-1}$ ?

Reference: Page 557, Introduction to Linear Algebra, Gilbert Strang

pic

Note: I am actually looking for an exaplanation based on linear algebra, by not going deep into statistics

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

I don't think we can understand where $V^{-1}$ comes from without a bit of statistics, so here's a statistics viewpoint (but using notation similar to Strang's notation). Suppose there is an $m \times n$ matrix $A$ and a vector $\bar x \in \mathbb R^n$ such that $$ Y = A \bar x + \epsilon. $$ Here $A$ and $\bar x$ are non-random but $\epsilon$ is a normally distributed random vector with mean $0$ and covariance matrix $V$. So $Y$ is a normally distributed random vector with mean $A \bar x$ and covariance matrix $V$. You can think of $Y$ as being a noisy measurement of the value of $A \bar x$.

Let $b \in \mathbb R^m$ be the observed value of $Y$. Our goal is to estimate $\bar x$, given $A$ and $b$. Let $f_Y$ be the probability density function for a normally distributed random vector with mean $Ax$ and covariance matrix $V$. Notice that $f_Y$ depends on $x$. A natural estimate of $\bar x$ is the maximum likelihood estimate \begin{align} \hat x &= \arg \max_x f_Y(b) \\ &= \arg \max_x \frac{1}{\sqrt{(2 \pi)^m |V|}}e^{-\frac12 (b - Ax)^T V^{-1}(b - Ax)} \end{align} Maximizing $f_Y(b)$ is equivalent to minimizing $-\ln(f_Y(b))$, which is equivalent to minimizing $$ E(x) = (b - Ax)^T V^{-1} (b - Ax). $$ That is how we arrive at our weighted least squares problem. Setting the gradient of $E$ equal to $0$ yields Strang's equation (10).

If the components of the random variable $\epsilon$ are independent, then $V$ is diagonal, so the formula for $E(x)$ simplifies to Strang's equation (11).

$\endgroup$
0
1
$\begingroup$

Here is a derivation of the formula (in terms of the weight matrix $W$).

Note that the matrix $W$ is necessarily positive definite. Let $M$ be a matrix such that $W = M^TM$ (such a matrix can be found using the Cholesky decomposition, for instance). Note that for any vector $x$, the weighted norm satisfies $$ x^TWx = (Mx)^T(Mx). $$ With that in mind, we can reframe our original problem as follows: $$ \min_{x \in \Bbb R^n} (Ax - b)^TW(Ax - b) = \\ \min_{x \in \Bbb R^n} [M(Ax - b)]^T[M(Ax - b)] = \\ \min_{x \in \Bbb R^n} [(MA)x - (Mb)]^T[(MA)x - (Mb)]. $$ In other words, the solution that we're looking for is the least squares solution to the equation $(MA) x = Mb$. Using the ordinary least-squares, the solution satisfies $$ (MA)^T(MA)\hat x = (MA)^T(Mb) \implies\\ A^T(M^TM) A \hat x = A^T(M^TM)b \implies\\ A^TWA\hat x = A^TWb. $$


Now, a question remains: why is $W = V^{-1}$ the correct choice of weight matrix? Once answer is that even if entries of $b$ are not uncorrelated with identical variance, then entries of $Mb$ will be, where $M$ is chosen such that $W = V^{-1} = M^TM$.

Indeed: we note that the covariance matrix of $b$ is given by $$ \Bbb E(bb^T) - \Bbb E(b)\Bbb E(b)^T. $$ We note that the covariance of the new variable $Mb$ is given by $$ \begin{align} \Bbb E((Mb)(Mb)^T) - \Bbb E(Mb) \Bbb E(Mb)^T &= \Bbb E(Mbb^TM^T) - \Bbb E(Mb)\Bbb E(b^TM^T) \\ & = M\Bbb E(bb^T)M^T - M\Bbb E(b)\Bbb E(b)^T M^T \\ & = M[\Bbb E(bb^T) - \Bbb E(b)\Bbb E(b)^T]M^T \\ & = MVM^T = M(M^TM)^{-1}M^T \\ & = MM^{-1}M^{-T}M^T = I. \end{align} $$ In other words, the covariance of each pair of components of $Mb$ is zero and the variance of each component is $1$.

Because the equation $(MA)x = (Mb)$ is such that the right side has entries that are uncorrelated with identical variance, it is more appropriate to compute its least squares solution (in the usual sense). As I explain in the first part of this answer, finding this least squares solution is equivalent to finding the weighted least squares solution for the original problem.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ I have added the statements in original reference. Still confused about the apprance of covariance matrix here. $\endgroup$ – Sooraj S Mar 8 at 6:41
  • $\begingroup$ How do you say that $W$ s positive definite ? I was actually thinking the weight matrix should be diagonal ! $\endgroup$ – Sooraj S Mar 9 at 12:31
  • $\begingroup$ @ss1729 A diagonal matrix with positive diagonal entries will be positive definite. More generally, though, covariance matrices are positive semidefinite. $\endgroup$ – Ben Grossmann Mar 9 at 14:26
  • $\begingroup$ @ss1729 When you say that the covariance matrix is diagonal, the corresponding assumption about the data is that the errors in the components of $b$ are uncorrelated (which holds, for instance, if the errors are independent). $\endgroup$ – Ben Grossmann Mar 9 at 14:29
  • $\begingroup$ @ss1729 See my latest edit. $\endgroup$ – Ben Grossmann Mar 9 at 14:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.