1
$\begingroup$

To my knowledge, a Stochastic Process is a set of Random Variables indexed by time.

Let's take the Bernoulli process as an example, which is a sequence of independent and identically distributed (iid) random variables.

But aren't those random variables in the Bernoulli process the same? Since every random variable is just a function that maps an outcome from the sample space to a real number, $F: S \to \mathbb{R}$.

If they are just a set of random variables that measure a coin-flip $\{Head, Tail\}$ to $\{T, F\}$, what makes these random variables different so that I need to index them by time ($X_1, X_2, ...$)?

$\endgroup$
8
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ If two random variables are independent, they can't be the same variable. Otherwise there's no way to distinguish, say, $E[X_1^2]$ and $E[X_1 X_2]$. $\endgroup$ Mar 2 at 2:58
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Intuitively, a random variable is the outcome of an experiment. If we toss a fair coin $10$ times, we have $10$ i.i.d. Bernoulli r.v's, but obviously the outcome of the tosses may be different. $\endgroup$
    – saulspatz
    Mar 2 at 3:15
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You may also find it worth examining the various types of equivalence for random variables detailed here on the Wikipedia page. The r.v.s in a stochastic process are equal in distribution, but that's weaker than being equal (or even almost-equal). To put a finer point on it: If two random variables are truly equal, then the probability of them being equal is 1. But the probability of two independent coin flips being equal is 1/2. $\endgroup$ Mar 2 at 4:26
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes, technically a random variable is a measurable function on a probability space, but I was talking about the intuitive idea they attempt to capture. There's some discussion of this here $\endgroup$
    – saulspatz
    Mar 2 at 4:39
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @OODWaterball Try this: $X_{i}$ is the random variable that measure the $i$-th coin-flip $\left\{Head_{i},Tail_{i}\right\}$ to $\left\{T,F\right\}$, this explains how the independence works in your example and why these random variables are different. $\endgroup$
    – Q9y5
    Mar 3 at 12:42
3
$\begingroup$

Maybe an example will help. Let's take the sample space to be the unit interval $[0,1]$, and the probability measure $P$ thereon to be Lebesgue measure. If $\omega\in[0,1]$ let $$ \sum_{n=1}^\infty {\omega_n\over 2^2} $$ be the base 2 expansion of $\omega$. Now define $X_n(\omega) :=\omega_n$ to be the $n$th binary digit of $\omega$. [In the ambiguous case of an $\omega$ with a terminating expansion, I choose the one than terminates in all $0$s.] The functions $X_n:[0,1]\to\{0,1\}$ are all different functions, but they all have the same distribution: $$ P[X_n=0] = P[X_n=1] = {1\over 2},\qquad n=1,2,\ldots. $$ In addition, the $X_n$s are mutually independent, so they constitute an instance of a "Bernoulli process".

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.