2
$\begingroup$

I was trying to prove the "theorem of exponential correspondence" and "exponential law" with $X,Y,Z$ compactly generated and Hausdorff.

According to Hedwin H.Spanier-Algebraic Topology and Tammo tom Dieck-Algebraic topology we have that locally compact seems necessary in order to prove the statement.

The true hyphotesis given on the spaces are Hausdorff locally compact, but as far as I can see, compactly generated and Hausdorff doesn't imply locally compact, am I right ? Are my hypothesis wrong ? Are there any counterexample.

Thanks in advance

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, if the exponential law holds for a space (in the compact-open topology), it implies it's locally compact Hausdorff. So it's indeed necessary; this has been known since the 1950's I think. $\endgroup$ – Henno Brandsma Feb 28 at 11:45
4
$\begingroup$

A simple example would be $\Bbb Q$, endowed with its usual topology. It is metrizable, and therefore compactly generated. But it is not locally compact.

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

You can take any non-locally compact metric space, for some familiar examples. E.g., the Baire space $\mathbb{N}^\mathbb{N}$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.