Let $K$ be an algebraically closed field and let $k$ be a subfield of $K$ such that the field extension $K \mid k$ is algebraic. Let $B$ be the polynomial ring $K [x_1, \ldots, x_n]$ and let $A$ be the subring $k [x_1, \ldots, x_n]$. It is clear that any $k$-subalgebra of $K$ is a field, so it follows that the intersection of $A$ and any maximal ideal of $B$ is a maximal ideal of $A$. Moreover, every maximal ideal of $A$ arises in this way.

Question. What are the maximal ideals of $A$, described in terms of the maximal ideals of $B$?

It is well-known that the maximal ideals of $B$ are all of the form $(x_1 - a_1, \ldots, x_n - a_n)$ for some $n$-tuple $(a_1, \ldots, a_n)$ of elements of $K$. Thus, for each maximal ideal $\mathfrak{m}$ of $A$, we may define the set $$P(\mathfrak{m}) = \{ (a_1, \ldots, a_n) \in K^n : (x_1 - a_1, \ldots, x_n - a_n) \cap A = \mathfrak{m} \}$$ and this set is finite (because it is a 0-dimensional closed subset of $\mathbb{A}^n_K$). Consider $G = \mathrm{Aut}(K \mid k)$. Of course, $G$ acts on $B$, and every element of $A$ is invariant under the action of $G$, so it follows that $P (\mathfrak{m})$ is closed under the action of $G$ in $K^n$ as well, i.e. $P (\mathfrak{m})$ is the union of $G$-orbits.

Conjecture. $G$ acts transitively on $P (\mathfrak{m})$.

This is certainly true if $k$ is a perfect field and $n = 1$ – after all, in that case, $\mathfrak{m}$ is a principal ideal generated by a polynomial in one variable irreducible over $k$. In fact this is true even without the assumption that $k$ is perfect: we know that the residue field $\kappa (\mathfrak{m}) = A / \mathfrak{m}$ is a finite field extension of $k$ and that the right $G$-set of $k$-algebra embeddings $\kappa (\mathfrak{m}) \to K$ is isomorphic to the right $G$-set of zeros in $K$ for the generator of $\mathfrak{m}$; but the homomorphism extension property of $\kappa (\mathfrak{m}) \to K$ implies that any two embeddings can be connected by an isomorphism of $K$, so $G$ acts transitively on the set of $k$-algebra embeddings $\kappa (\mathfrak{m}) \to K$.

What about the general case where $n > 1$? I had always taken for granted that the indicated conjecture was true, but I have not been able to find a proof in the usual places. By descent theory, one can show that $$\operatorname{Spec} B \otimes_k B \rightrightarrows \operatorname{Spec} B \to \operatorname{Spec} A$$ is a coequaliser diagram in the category of schemes, so $\operatorname{Spec} A$ is a scheme-theoretic quotient of $\operatorname{Spec} B$ by an internal equivalence relation, but it is not clear to me what this internal equivalence relation is when $n > 0$. (For $n = 0$ and $k$ perfect, something quite remarkable happens: $\operatorname{Spec} K \otimes_k K$ has a canonical continuous free transitive action of $\mathrm{Gal}(K \mid k)$!)


It is well-known that the set of maximal ideals of $k[x_1,\dotsc,x_n]$ corresponds to $K^n / \mathrm{Aut}(K/k)$. In fact, every maximal ideal $\mathfrak{m}$ has a residue field which is finite over $k$ (Corollary of Noether normalization), hence has an embedding into $K$, so $\mathfrak{m} = \{f \in k[x_1,\dotsc,x_n] : f(a)=0\}$ for some $a \in K^n$. When $a,b$ are conjugate under the action of $\mathrm{Aut}(K/k)$, the maximal ideals clearly coincide. Conversely, if $\{f : f(a)=0\} = \{f : f(b)=0\}$, then $k(a_1,\dotsc,a_n) \cong k(b_1,\dotsc,b_n)$ via $a_i \mapsto b_i$, and this extends to an automorphism of the algebraic closure $K$. Hence $a$ and $b$ are conjugate.

Hence, $\mathrm{Spm}(k[x_1,\dotsc,x_n]) \cong \mathrm{Spm}(K[x_1,\dotsc,x_n]) / \mathrm{Aut}(K/k)$ as sets.

More generally, if $R \subseteq R'$ is an integral extension of normal domains such that $Q(R')/Q(R)$ is a normal field extension, then $\mathrm{Spm}(R) \cong \mathrm{Spm}(R') / \mathrm{Aut}(R'/R)$ and the same with $\mathrm{Spec}$ (Cohen-Seidenberg).


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.