If you were teaching students about this, then perhaps you could mention strategies that ultimately don't work. If we rewrite
$$
ax^2+bx+c=0
$$
as
$$
x=-\frac{ax^2+c}{b}
$$
then $x$ is still written in terms of $x^2$, meaning that we can't get anywhere. Similarly, if we make $x^2$ the subject of the equation, then we don't get anywhere. The crux of the derivation of the quadratic formula is realising that
\begin{align}
ax^2+bx+c &= a\left(x^2+\frac{b}{a}x+\frac{c}{a}\right) \\[4pt]
&= a\left(\left(x+\frac{b}{2a}\right)^2-\left(\frac{b}{2a}\right)^2 + \frac{c}{a}\right) \, .
\end{align}
From here, there is only a single term containing $x$, and the rest that follows is the basic algebraic manipulation you mentioned earlier. You might want to make things look cleaner by writing the equation
$$
x^2+\frac{b}{a}x+\frac{c}{a}=0
$$
as
$$
x^2 + 2Bx + C = 0 \, ,
$$
with $2B=b/a$ and $C=c/a$. Then, the factorisation is
$$
(x+B)^2-B^2+C=0 \, ,
$$
and here it is abundantly clear why completing the square is such a powerful method.