'Mean' appearance of $\pi$...

I just came across a strange result, where $$\pi$$ unexpectedly pops up.

Consider two real numbers $$a$$ and $$b$$, now repeat the following steps-

1. Replace $$a$$ by the arithmetic mean of the two numbers.
2. Replace $$b$$ by the geometric mean of the two numbers.

In mathematical terms,

$$\forall a,b \in R$$, We define a sequence $$a_i$$ and $$b_i$$ such that $$a_n=\dfrac{a_{n-1}+b_{n-1}}{2}$$ and $$b_n=\sqrt{a_{n}b_{n-1}}$$.

After sufficient numbers of iterations of the same steps, it is observed that $$a\text{~}b$$, that is $$a_\infty=b_\infty$$, which we can easily prove.

At $$a=1$$ and $$b=2$$, I get the following value of convergence: 1.6539866862653758, which turns out to be equal to $$\frac{3\sqrt3}{\pi}$$!

Python code below:

a=1
b=2
while(a!=b):
a=(a+b)/2 #Arithmatic mean
b=pow((a*b),0.5) #Geometric mean
print(a)
#print(3*pow(3,0.5)/a) which equals pi


Here is a method which explains, and generalizes the case for all values of $$a$$ and $$b$$, but I am still looking for a better intuition...

$$"Let (a=b\cos\theta)\\ Given(a_{1}=\displaystyle \dfrac{a+b}{2}) \\(\displaystyle { a }_{ 1 }=\dfrac { b\cos { \theta +b } }{ 2 } =b\cos ^{ 2 }{ \dfrac { \theta }{ 2 } } ) \\(b_{ 1 }=\sqrt { a_{ 1 }b } =\sqrt { { b }^{ 2 }\cos ^{ 2 }{ \dfrac { \theta }{ 2 } } } =b\cos { \dfrac { \theta }{ 2 } }) Given \\(\displaystyle a_{ 2 }=\dfrac { a_{ 1 }+b_{ 1 } }{ 2 } =\dfrac { b\cos ^{ 2 }{ \dfrac { \theta }{ 2 } +b\cos { \dfrac { \theta }{ 2 } } } }{ 2 } =\dfrac{b \cos \dfrac{\theta}{2}(\cos \dfrac{\theta}{2}+1)}{2}=b\cos { \dfrac { \theta }{ 2 } } \cos ^{ 2 }{ \dfrac { \theta }{ 4 } } ) \\( \displaystyle b_{2}=\sqrt{a_{2}b_{1}}) \\(\displaystyle =\sqrt { { b }^{ 2 }\cos ^{ 2 }{ \frac { \theta }{ 2 } } \cos ^{ 2 }{ \frac { \theta }{ 4 } } } ) \\(\displaystyle b_{2}=b\cos { \frac { \theta }{ 2 } } \cos { \frac { \theta }{ 4 } } )Similarly, \\(\displaystyle b_{ 3 }=b\cos { \frac { \theta }{ 2 } } \cos { \frac { \theta }{ 4 } } \cos { \frac { \theta }{ 8 } } )So,\\(b_{ n }=b\cos { \dfrac { \theta }{ 2 } } \cos { \dfrac { \theta }{ 4 } } \cos { \dfrac { \theta }{ 8 } } ......\cos { \dfrac { \theta }{ { 2 }^{ n } } } )Now, \\(b_{ \infty }=\displaystyle \lim _{ n\rightarrow \infty }{ { b }_{ n } } )\text{we can reduce} \\(b_n=\dfrac {b\cos { \dfrac { \theta }{ 2 } } \cos { \dfrac { \theta }{ 4 } } \cos { \dfrac { \theta }{ 8 } } ......2 \sin { \dfrac { \theta }{ { 2 }^{ n } }} \cos { \dfrac { \theta }{ { 2 }^{ n } } }}{2 \sin { \dfrac { \theta }{ { 2 }^{ n } }}}=\dfrac {b\cos { \dfrac { \theta }{ 2 } } \cos { \dfrac { \theta }{ 4 } } \cos { \dfrac { \theta }{ 8 } } ...... \cos { \dfrac { \theta }{ { 2 }^{ n-1 } } }}{2 \sin { \dfrac { \theta }{ { 2 }^{ n } }}} )\text{and thus reducing so on, we get}\\(=\displaystyle \lim _{ n\rightarrow \infty }{ \displaystyle \dfrac { (\dfrac { \theta }{ { 2 }^{ n } } )b\sin { \theta } }{ \theta \sin { (\displaystyle\frac { \theta }{ { 2 }^{ n } } } ) } } =\dfrac { b\sin { \theta } }{ \theta } =\dfrac { \sqrt { 1-\dfrac { { a }^{ 2 } }{ { b }^{ 2 } } } }{ \cos ^{ -1 }{ (\dfrac { a }{ b } ) } } =\dfrac { \sqrt {{ { b }^{ 2 }-{ a }^{ 2 } }} }{ \cos ^{ -1 }{ (\dfrac { a }{ b } ) } } )"$$

Hence, at $$a=1$$ and $$b=2$$, we get the $$\pi$$ through the inverse of cos term. It is counterintuitive that $$\pi$$ turns up here through mere substitution, and I am hopeful that there exists a more natural, better understanding of this problem than the one mentioned above, which connects together the seemingly unreleated areas of maths.

Can anyone please help me with any alternative, more elegant, or visual solution?

P.S.--

This doesn't answer my question, and just is another form of the proof given above. I am looking for a more intuitive/visual/elegant proof for why pi turns up here....

EDIT-- have tried adding an image of the convergence table of the sequence

• You might be interested in reading about the arithmetic-geometric mean of Gauss. Feb 13, 2021 at 13:18
• Subtle as it is, the thing defined here is not the arithmetic-geometric mean. Feb 13, 2021 at 13:46
• What are the unconvincing steps in the proof ? And which seemingly unreleated areas ?
– user65203
Feb 13, 2021 at 14:05
• Umm... For $a=2$ and $b=1$ you don't get that... Feb 13, 2021 at 14:14
• Please don't mix up "this proof didn't provide the intuition I was after" with "this proof is unconvincing". The latter suggests that the proof is in error. The former suggests that you haven't understood the proof well enough to figure out the intuition behind it. Which is quite evidently the case here. Anytime $\pi$ shows up, there is a circle hiding somewhere. Here you should be looking for it in that substitution. Feb 13, 2021 at 22:21